|
Reports
that the MQM is joining the ruling alliance comes as good news.
Very few people were sure that the new government, especially in
Sindh, could have survived for long without partnering with the
ethnic party representing the mohajirs of urban Sindh. Initially,
it was feared that the establishment might not let the MQM join
the ruling coalition and use the party to create instability. It
was heartening to know that the establishment finally seems to have
given up. Or perhaps, it needed to get the MQM into the coalition
to keep a watch over the new regime and to keep it on its toes.
Many Pakistan observers consider this particular coalition a double-edged
sword precisely because of the MQM's affinity with the establishment.
Some people are even of the view that the ethnic party played a
critical role in brokering a deal between the new regime and the
establishment as a result of which the new PPP chief is now allowed
to pursue life more normally without any court cases to divert his
attention.
Being
part of the coalition is certainly advantageous to the MQM because
this will allow it a share in the resources of the province and
keep its control over the urban centres of Sindh. The new regime
provides the party with yet another opportunity to partner with
the political parties rather than just with the establishment. The
MQM will continue to have two partners, a strategy which it considers
vital for its survival. It is probably conscious of the fact that
the establishment, especially the intelligence agencies, have a
lot of power to activate rival groups such as the MQM-Haqiqi or
the religious groups to counter the MQM's influence in the urban
centres of Sindh.
The
relationship between the MQM and the establishment is as much a
reality of today's Pakistan as the party's presence in the urban
centres of Sindh. These are the two realities which the country
will have to deal with the foreseeable future. The current MQM-establishment
alliance has both tactical and strategic reasons. Tactically, this
is due to the ethnic affiliation between the party head and the
president. After all, when most parties dumped Musharraf before
the onset of the recent political crisis, he hung on to the MQM,
particularly during the May 12 mayhem in Karachi. This resulted
in a lot of people commenting on the ethnic links between the party
and the president. Surely, some commentators went overboard, but
the linkage cannot be disregarded.
From
the MQM's perspective, in particular, personal linkages are historically
important. During the early 1990s, the army chief General Aslam
Beg had brought up the issue of the repatriation of stranded Biharis
from Bangladesh, which is considered critical to boosting the numbers
of Urdu-speaking mohajirs in Pakistan. General Beg, it must be remembered,
was the first mohajir army chief. Reportedly, he was the only mohajir
officer serving in the higher echelons of the army after a long
time. The mohajir community was well represented in the country's
establishment until the 1970s. In 1968, 11 out of 48 senior positions
in the army were held by the mohajirs. The situation changed with
Pushtoon generals like Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan and Gul Hassan Khan
making it to the top of the largest service of the armed forces.
This equation did not change until Beg's arrival as the chief of
army staff. Today, there is again a considerably greater number
of mohajir officers serving in senior positions, a situation which
is probably owed to the command of Generals Beg and Musharraf. Given
the fact that the military is an influential organisation, the service
chiefs have played a critical role in keeping the MQM close to the
establishment.
The
other tactical reason for the connection between the MQM and the
establishment pertains to the need for the party to survive socially
and politically. The military operation during the 1990s, which
resulted in the killings of a lot of MQM members, made the party
conscious of the need to remain on the right side of the establishment
(and also build contacts with mohajir officers). Moreover, the party
is conscious of the establishment's ability to launch other actors
in Karachi and other urban centres such as Jaish-e-Mohammad and
Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan, which had replaced the MQM during the 1990s,
after the party fell out with the military and its intelligence
agencies.
Strategically,
the MQM-establishment alliance is understandable. This is probably
the approach adopted by most parties or groups which try to survive
as a minority or are unable to become part of the mainstream political
discourse. Although many believe that the MQM was the brainchild
of the military intelligence agencies, the fact is that during the
mid-1980s, when the ethnic party was created, it got a lot of explicit
and implicit support from the larger mohajir community.
The
1970s marked a shift in the thinking of this ethnic community, which
found itself unable to thwart the advances of the other ethnic communities
in urban Sindh. The mohajirs were part of the establishment, even
before the 1970s, due to their involvement in the civil and military
bureaucracy of the post-colonial state. However, after the rise
of the PPP, the mohajirs found it difficult to retain the space
they had occupied earlier in the larger state apparatus. The PPP
got votes in the Punjab and interior Sindh and was keen to satisfy
its other constituents. The mohajirs had a problem of being a minority
in a country which they had made their own in 1947. However, they
could never change their status as a minority and, thus, had no
legitimate way of creating greater political space for themselves.
MQM
was born in this vacuum. While the Zia regime saw the MQM as a conduit
of its policy to counter the PPP, the MQM latched on to the regime
to build itself and become a politico-militant force. One cannot
forget the days of absolute horror during the 1980s when any criticism
of the MQM leadership would prove costly, in terms of the security
of life and property.
Since
the 1980s, the party has expanded its network. Generally known for
extracting money from local businesses in urban Sindh, the party
reportedly has similar networks in other parts of the world as well,
including the US, Canada, Europe and South Africa. Like a state,
the party ensures that it extracts resources in return for protection
and providing opportunities. The militancy makes the party more
of a mafia than just a political party. Its followers include the
youth who continue to support the leader, Altaf Hussain, and are
willing to kill for him or get killed because they find the party
and its leadership as the only source of hope in a place that does
not guarantee them any political space.
The
MQM has managed to create a support base among the lower class and
the lower-middle class mohajirs. The youth from this particular
segment of the mohajir community probably have a sense of empowerment
through aligning with a party which seems to have given them guns
instead of books. There is a clear class divide within the mohajir
community of the urban centres of Sindh. In Karachi, areas like
the Federal B Area or Lalu Khet have turned into ghettos as well
as recruitment centres for the MQM. The party leadership probably
benefits from the situation because it is the lower classes, which
not only willingly become the fodder, but also serve as the major
support base for Altaf Hussain. It is this particular class support
which makes it difficult for the more educated leadership of the
party to come to the top. At the end of the day, it is about the
politics of charisma which always works better in limited political
spaces.
Unless there is willingness among the other ethnic groups to talk
to the mohajirs and for the national parties to solve the ethnic
problem in the country, it is difficult to visualise the MQM without
Altaf Hussain, guns or the establishment.
|