|
The
more things change in Pakistan, the more they remain the same. When
the army chief staged another coup on November 3, 2007, the standard
operating procedure was employed for the putsch: soldiers were mobilised,
a media blackout was engineered, flights were disrupted, key political
figures were arrested and, amid a flurry of rumours, the coup maker
came on air on state-run Pakistan Television, as usual around midnight,
dishing out the hackneyed justification that the country was in
danger and the constitution was not good enough to provide the required
remedies.
What
distinguished this coup from others was that it was staged in the
presence of a vibrant private broadcast media: dozens of television
channels and FM radio stations providing Pakistanis news in real
time. At least until that moment. Musharraf made sure his team pulled
the plug on all TV channels (including foreign ones) and radio stations
before the state of emergency was formally announced on PTV - whose
control, in keeping with tradition, was also seized beforehand.
What
was shocking about the coup was that it was not ostensibly against
the government of the day (Musharraf's own) but against the judiciary
and the media. Both were blamed for the deterioration of law and
order and proliferation of terrorism.
"Glorification
of violence by the media," said Musharraf, was a major factor
in his decision to impose the emergency.
Even
before the emergency was officially announced, draconian curbs were
imposed on the media. The measures to control and restrain the media
included suspension of broadcasts of all national and international
news channels, except the dour PTV, until further notice. Non-government
satellite TV channels were prevented from uplinking to satellites
and banned from carriage on domestic cable networks - the source
through which most Pakistanis have access to independent TV news.
At least 34 Pakistani channels were taken off air, including a dozen
popular 24/7 current affairs channels such as Geo, ARY, Aaj, Dawn
News, KTN, and Khyber TV, as well as international news channels
such as CNN and BBC.
Cable
television operators in Islamabad said that "strangers who
refused to identify themselves" entered their offices at key
distribution points just ahead of the emergency and ordered them
to do as they were told or risk arrest and closure of business.
The "strangers," who were clearly intelligence personnel,
took charge of dropping all news and current affairs channels from
the airwaves, while retaining Indian entertainment channels and
non-news international channels such as National Geographic, Animal
Planet and Discovery to fill up the channel feed lines for public
access.
Hours
later, the government notified the media of curbs imposed on them
through two decrees amending the PEMRA Ordinance and the Press,
Newspapers, News Agencies and Books Registration Ordinance, prohibiting
printing or broadcasting of "anything which defames or brings
into ridicule the head of state, or members of the armed forces,
or executive, legislative or judicial organs of the state."
Non-compliance with the new restrictions could be punishable by
the suspension of a newspaper publication for up to 30 days, and,
in the case of television stations, by imprisonment of up to three
years, a fine of Rs.10 million, or both.
The
amendments also prohibited the media from publishing or broadcasting
"any material that is likely to jeopardise or be prejudicial
to the ideology of Pakistan or the sovereignty, integrity or security
of Pakistan, or any material that is likely to incite violence or
hatred or create inter-faith disorder or be prejudicial to maintenance
of law and order." The amendment to the PEMRA Ordinance bans
television discussions on "sub judice matters or anything which
is known to be false or baseless or is mala fide or for which there
exist sufficient reasons to believe that the same may be false,
baseless or mala fide."
The
amendments restricted the publication or broadcast of photographs
or video of suicide bombers, terrorists (except if required by the
law-enforcement agencies for the purpose of investigation), bodies
of victims of terrorist activities, statements and pronouncements
of militants and extremist elements and any other thing which may,
in any way, promote, aid or abet terrorist activities or terrorism,
or their graphic and printed representation based on sectarianism
and ethnicity or racialism. Private Pakistani radio and television
stations are also banned from signing broadcast agreements with
foreign news media without PEMRA's permission, while cable operators
and distributors can be sentenced to up to a year in prison for
breaking the new rules.
Within
minutes of the emergency, PEMRA raided two private radio stations,
FM99 in Islamabad and FM103 in Karachi, confiscating their broadcast
equipment. Both these stations are known for their 'nose for news'
and emphasis on journalism. Several staff members of FM99, according
to Station Director Najib Ahmed, who is also the president of the
Association of Independent Radio, were roughed up and the station
was ransacked.
Soon
after, the police raided the Islamabad office of Aaj, seeking to
confiscate broadcasting equipment. According to Talat Hussain, the
channel's director of news and current affairs, the police wanted
to impound a van that is used to broadcast live coverage. The office
refused to hand over the equipment as the police team did not have
the necessary legal documents. Three days later, the police stormed
the Aaj offices again, interrupting the satellite signal it was
using to transmit internationally. Police also seized the van.
It
did not take long for media organisations, including the All Pakistan
Newspaper Society (APNS), the Council of Pakistan Newspaper Editors
(CPNE), the Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA) and the Pakistan
Association of Independent Radio, to condemn the repression. Huma
Ali, president of the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, described
the government's actions as "the worst kind of repression against
the media in Pakistan in 30 years."
The
print media faced equal scrutiny and intimidation. The Press Information
Department (PID), at the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
in Islamabad, created a special bureau with instructions to monitor
at least 21 national dailies and 13 leading regional newspapers
to see that they respect the censorship rules introduced in the
new print media ordinance. The newspapers under surveillance include
The News, Dawn, The Nation, Daily Times, Jang, Nawa-e-Waqt and Khabrain.
The provincial governments were also instructed to monitor compliance
with new reporting restrictions. Officials say the PID started sending
a report at 4 p.m. every day to the head of the ministry's Home
Publicity Department.
In
the following three weeks, things got much worse, at least as far
as legal and technical restrictions on the media and physical violence
against journalists was concerned. Reacting to the stringent curbs
on the media sector, journalists across the country adopted an overt
mode of resistance and triggered an unprecedented series of protest
demonstrations across the country.
In
several cases, these protests elicited a violent response from the
security agencies. In one instance, on November 20, a record 190
journalists were arrested in a single evening, several of them badly
beaten up by the police, in Karachi, as they protested the arrest
of 12 of their colleagues earlier in the day. At least 20 of the
detained journalists were women. While most of them were released
the next day (with several journalists taken to hospitals for medical
care), the numbers are surely an international record of sorts -
a dubious distinction for Musharraf's media policies that are incongruous
with the stated policies of the past five years. In the three weeks
following the state of emergency, more than 340 journalists were
arrested, surely another record.
While
Pakistan's working journalists braved batons on the streets, media
owners faced their own intimidation horrors. On November 17, the
Dubai authorities summarily gave Geo Television Network and ARY
Digital less than two hours to halt their broadcast after reportedly
persistent pressure from the Pakistan government. They were two
of the leading Pakistani television channels that had refused to
sign on the dotted line of an unpublicised 14-page code of conduct
(even those signing were not given a copy; the representatives of
channels were asked to come to the PEMRA office to read it there
and sign) as some other channels had. Both channels, which were
registered in Dubai after being denied terrestrial licenses in Pakistan,
had already been unavailable to Pakistanis through cable TV distribution
networks since the emergency was imposed, although they continued
to broadcast via satellite and the Internet. This marked a new chapter
in the browbeating of the Pakistani media by Musharraf: he peddled
his influence outside Pakistan to get his way against the media
of his own country.
This
unprecedented development did not go unnoticed by international
rights groups. "Musharraf isn't content with muzzling critical
media coverage of his repression within Pakistan - now he is pressuring
Dubai to abet his crackdown on independent reporting," said
Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "The US should
publicly call on its close ally in Dubai to lift the bans. Dubai's
government should refuse to be an accomplice to Musharraf's assault
on free speech in Pakistan. By making itself a party to Musharraf's
repression of the Pakistani media, Dubai is damaging its own international
reputation. This move sets an appalling precedent and raises serious
questions about Dubai's viability as a regional hub for the international
media."
Although
Geo complied with the orders of the Dubai authorities, it went on
the offensive against the Pakistan government by announcing that
it would shift its broadcast base to a freer country and continue
broadcasting.
After
that, matters only got uglier. On November 15, Mir Shakilur Rehman,
the owner of Geo, emailed his senior staff informing them that he
had received a "threatening telephone call last night"
from the Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI), adding that he
had been taken to an ISI safe house in Islamabad where he was given
a warning by an ISI operative who told him, "I would like to
advise you to please follow the laws, especially the newly promulgated
law." MSR, as Rehman is known to his staff, also forwarded
an email from a person identifying himself as "Sabir,"
saying, "Pakistan army is the backbone of Pakistan, don't try
to damage it, if u do, u and your family who have looted billions
would be hunted down like rats. It will just take a few people to
smash your studios, offices, vans."
There
was more: MSR told a joint meeting of the APNS, the CPNE and the
PBA that he had been subjected to great pressure and threats since
the beginning of 2007, including an attempt on his life, for which
he had filed a criminal complaint in a city police station in Karachi.
He said that he faced the pressures and challenges to the best of
his ability, but found it necessary to inform the media community
of the situation. He said one of the more serious threats he had
received was an email, ostensibly from a Taliban outfit, threatening
to blow up his printing presses and the staff of the Jang Group
publications unless they stopped printing photographs of young women.
Geo,
part of Pakistan's largest media group, has sustained severe financial
losses as a result of the ban on its transmission. The government
has withdrawn advertising from its main newspapers, Jang and The
News, as punishment. The government is the largest advertiser in
the country, and under well-established procedures agreed between
journalist bodies and Pakistan's Ministry of Information, advertising
is supposed to be equitably distributed among publications on the
basis of such criteria as newspaper circulation, language, geographic
reach and target audience.
Meanwhile, the government
initiated talks with individual TV channels, principally Geo, Aaj
and ARY and started making unreasonable demands in return for allowing
the channels to be not just back on satellite transmission from
Dubai but also to be available to viewers through the cable distribution
network. While no official from each of these three channels was
willing to be quoted, they separately outlined the same set of criteria
from the government to their respective TV channels: a ban on all
kinds of live coverage; zero criticism of Musharraf, the army and
the "PCO judiciary"; a ban on showing visuals of suicide
bombers, the bodies of victims either at the site of an incident
or at hospitals and clinics, and close-ups of attack sites including
damaged vehicles; and, an end to certain shows, including Geo's
Merey Mutabiq, Aaj Kamran Khan Kay Saath and Capital Talk, Aaj's
Live With Talat and Bolta Pakistan, and ARY's current affairs shows
conducted by Kashif Abbasi.
While the channels are willing to compromise on demands for zero
or minimal criticism of Musharraf, military and the judiciary and
minimising visuals of terrorist incidents, they originally stuck
to their demand of the right to live coverage and their signature
current affairs shows. However, when the channels did not budge,
the government demanded that Geo sack Dr Shahid Masood, Kamran Khan
and Hamid Mir (as well as not allow The News senior staffer Ansar
Abbasi from appearing on any of their programmes), that Aaj fire
Talat Hussain, Nusrat Javed and Mushtaq Minhas, and that ARY show
the door to Kashif Abbasi and Asma Shirazi.
When Aaj and ARY agreed to drop the shows of Talat Hussain, Nusrat
Javed, Mushtaq Minhas, Kashif Abbasi and Asma Shirazi, at least
for the time being, they were promptly rewarded by the restoration
of their cable network access in Pakistan. Geo, however, refused
to fire its top journalists or drop their massively popular programmes.
This has meant that while some of the key news channels are back
- complete with hourly bulletins and 'breaking news' - thanks to
the unannounced code of conduct that now governs content of news,
their news now seems little more than stylish versions of the drab
PTV bulletins. To both comply with and simultaneously express defiance,
ARY and Aaj are staging open-air "live" versions of their
banned shows in public outside press clubs in Islamabad. As an expression
of solidarity with ARY and Aaj, Geo is also hosting similar "live"
shows of Capital Talk. It is no surprise these road shows quickly
became popular and well attended, even with Islamabad's otherwise
stereotypically indifferent residents becoming passionately involved.
This is not the only example of defiance of the government's unpopular
measures to restrict freedom of expression and access to information.
A symbiotic relationship between the media and the citizens started
evolving virtually as soon as the state of emergency was imposed.
The mainstream news channels set up live streaming on their websites
where 24/7 coverage ensured that many of the country's estimated
20 million Internet users logged on. Web news is available in both
English and Urdu, and even in Sindhi, to satiate the growing hunger
for news.
Interestingly, those in Pakistan with Internet - and therefore access
to new sites - are not passively consuming information; they are
passing it around through emails and blogs (dozens of blogs have
sprung up, providing specific information such as where the next
media protest will be held) are using the information to network
towards mobilising resistance and arranging protests. This has resulted
in independent websites increasing their content.
Because the government thinks in conventional ways, it had not seen
mobile phones as a medium for news. However, Pakistan has 70 million
mobile phone users. Calls are cheap and texting even more so. Hence,
between calling the media and friends on their mobile phones, people
are managing to get at least important bits of information every
day. After the government disrupted cable TV distribution, most
current affairs channels sent SMS text messages to millions of mobile
phone users, telling them to log onto their website to get live
transmission and text news. According to sources in the telecom
sector, daily mobile phone calls have increased sevenfold and text
messaging tenfold since the emergency was imposed, indicating the
elevation of the status of mobile telephony as a formal source of
information.
The radio sector - about 160 FM stations are licensed in the private
sector of which around 70 are on air across Pakistan - however,
has been severely hit as it is the most vulnerable. Only a handful
of stations do regular news bulletins and current affairs programming.
To make an example of them, two of the leading radio stations, FM99
in Islamabad and FM103 in Karachi, got the rough end of the stick:
their transmitters and broadcast consoles were taken away (along
with most other equipment), thereby silencing them. Transmitters
are extremely difficult to come by in Pakistan - most are smuggled
in and are expensive. Other stations have taken a cue from the crackdown
and stopped doing news and information programming to avoid the
confiscation of hard-to-come-by equipment. However, foreign radio
stations such as BBC and Voice of America have increased airtime
for emergency-related coverage and that has caused sales of radio
sets to soar.
The week that the state of emergency was imposed by Musharraf, the
international media watchdog Reporters sans frontières issued
its latest annual ranking of media freedom. Of a total of 169 countries
assessed, Pakistan was ranked a dismal 152. This was before November
3, the day the state of emergency was imposed. Thanks to Musharraf,
Pakistan is now virtually at the bottom of the heap. So much for
"Pakistan first." As far as media freedoms are concerned,
it is a case of "Pakistan last."
|