|
Election
fever is unlikely to hit Balochistan. The major nationalist parties,
including the Pakhtoonkhawa Milli Awami Party, the Balochistan National
Party-Mengal and the National Party, have decided to boycott the
2008 elections, insisting that free and fair elections are impossible
in the absence of an independent judiciary. The only significant
parties still contesting the polls are those which formed a coalition
government in the province in 2002: the PML-Q, JUI-F and BNP-Awami.
Their popularity in the province, however, has fallen sharply since
the last elections because of the army operation launched during
their tenure, coupled with their failure to provide economic uplift
for the Baloch population.
It
is believed that the nationalist parties' decision to boycott the
polls will adversely affect voter turnout and give greater legitimacy
to those nationalists who want to quit parliamentary politics. Political
observers are also of the view that the nationalist parties could
have taken advantage of the favourable political environment and
made headway in the province, especially since their effort to initiate
a countrywide boycott of the elections failed. But as Mehmood Khan
Achakzai, the head of Pakistan Oppressed Nations Movement and convenor
of the All Parties Democratic Movement, says, "Politicians
have always been blaming the judiciary for legalising the unconstitutional
steps of dictators. But after 60 years, judges of the superior judiciary
showed courage for the first time in the history of Pakistan and
rendered a big sacrifice for democracy and politicians. Now it is
the duty of politicians and political parties that they should stand
behind those judges who did not take oath under the PCO."
Meanwhile,
the JUI-F has been unable to stand united and a faction within the
party, calling itself the "ideological group," is fielding
its own candidates for four National Assembly and 21 provincial
assembly seats. This faction is opposed to Maulana Muhammad Khan
Sherani, the provincial amir of the JUI-F, for moulding the policies
of the MMA in favour of Musharraf, contrary to the alliance's manifesto.
Some
sources said that Maulana Muhammad Khan Sherani played a vital role
in paving the way for the passage of the 17th Amendment legalising
Musharraf's Legal Framework Order. "I have great respect for
Maulana Muhammad Khan Sherani," said Musharraf during a gathering
last year at the Governor's House in Quetta. Because of this, Sherani
is being viewed as anti-Taliban by the pro-Taliban faction within
the JUI-F.
The PML-Q and its ally BNP-Awami are expected to benefit from this
inter-party friction. The PML-Q is also likely to take advantage
of the boycott in the Baloch-populated areas, particularly in the
Kalat and Mekran zones as well as much of Quetta. These areas were
regarded as strongholds of the nationalists. Meanwhile, the Pashtun
areas of Balochistan are expected to be dominated by the JUI-F,
with the ANP not expected to put up a strong showing.
The
field, according to observers, has been further tilted in favour
of the pro-establishment parties in the run-up to the election.
The JUI-F faced a difficult situation following a Supreme Court
verdict, on the eve of previous local bodies' elections, stating
that without passing English, Urdu and Pakistan Studies the certificates
of religious seminaries would not be equal to matric, intermediate,
graduation and post graduation. "There was a general impression
that the JUI-F would face serious difficulties over the issue of
certificates from religious seminaries, but despite that all candidates
of the JUI-F were allowed to contest elections, ignoring the verdict
of the Supreme Court," said an observer.
A
PML-Q candidate attached what is believed to be a fake certificate
from Karachi University in his nomination papers for the Senate
elections in 2002. He is completing his term on that certificate.
Now he is a candidate for the general elections, but instead of
attaching the previous certificate he has attached another certificate
from the same university with his nomination papers. Objections
to his candidacy were raised, but he was allowed to contest the
election. Additionally, says a source, "An independent candidate
could not read his certificate from a religious seminary, which
was written in Arabic, when asked to do so at a responsible forum.
But despite that his nomination papers were accepted."
The
nomination papers of some PML-Q candidates were also accepted while
they were not eligible to contest elections under NAB rules, but
Ghulam Akbar Lasi, a PPP candidate, was disqualified on the same
grounds.
Sarfaraz
Ahmed Bugti, a PPP candidate for NA-265 (Dera Bugti-Sibi and Kohlu)
as well as PB-24 Dera Bugti, was stopped from filing his nomination
papers. An intelligence agency is reported to have brought in its
favourite, Tariq Masoori, a nominee of the PML-Q, in an attempt
to have him elected unopposed to the provincial assembly seat.
In a constitutional petition filed in the Balochistan High Court,
Sarfaraz Bugti submitted that he was detained by an officer of the
agency who did not allow him to file his nomination papers within
the stipulated period. The court allowed him to file his papers
for both seats after it was confirmed that he was detained under
the Maintenance of Public Order Law.
The
local press in Balochistan is filled with allegations that a large
amount of money was given to former members of the Balochistan Assembly
belonging to the PML-Q, BNP-Awami and other pro-Musharraf members
for initiating development work on the eve of elections. "Members
of the PML-Q and its allies were given Rs1.6 billion on the pretext
of initiating development works to ensure their success in the next
elections," disclosed Shafiq Ahmed Khan, a former PPP MPA.
Many
observers are also raising questions about the impartiality of the
caretaker government in the province, some of whose members were
office bearers of the PML-Q before their induction in the provincial
caretaker cabinet.
|