|
After
narrowly escaping a series of assassination attempts, General Musharraf
got some much-needed respite when he won a protracted constitutional
battle legitimising his rule. A vote of confidence by the Parliament
allows him to stay on as President for the next four years. It was
the second boost for the military ruler in a week. On the last day
of the year, lawmakers approved a series of amendments in the constitution
making him an all-powerful leader vested with the authority to dismiss
an elected government as well as Parliament.
Musharraf owed his triumph solely to his new-found alliance
with the hardline religious groups that have been at odds with him
for his pro-US policies as well as his domestic crackdown on Islamic
militancy. In return for their support for his presidency, Musharraf
has agreed to shed his military uniform by the end of the year.
"There comes a time in the lives of nations when important
decisions must be taken," he said. "That time has come."
The government hopes the move will end the political deadlock, which
had paralysed Parliament since the elections 14 months ago.
However,
the union between the pro-US president and the religious coalition,
Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA), that achieved unprecedented success
in the last parliamentary elections on the back of anti-American
slogans, may have far reaching impact on Pakistan's security. "The
deal has strengthened the traditional alliance between the mullahs
and the military," says Samina Ahmed, director of the Brussels-based
International Crisis Group. "It has strengthened the Islamists'
hold over the bordering provinces where, according to the US, the
Taliban are regrouping. This is one of the main problems Musharraf
has to confront."
This "marriage of convenience", however, has not
deterred the more extremist elements from plotting to kill him.
Ironically, the suicide attack on the President's convoy came just
a day after the signing of the deal between the MMA and the government.
"He is a marked man and they are after his life," says
retired general Talat Masood. "Musharraf will have to realise
he cannot ride on both boats."
President
Musharraf looked visibly shaken when he described on national television
on Christmas day how he saw a pick-up laden with explosives racing
towards his motorcade. A courageous policeman blocked the path of
the attacking vehicle, slowing it sufficiently to allow the President's
car to pass the potentially fatal spot before 60 pounds of explosives
detonated. Debris from the car just behind him smashed the windscreen
of Musharraf's armour-plated Mercedes Benz.
It was the second attempt on his life in less than two weeks.
Both took place in Rawalpindi, the seat of the Pakistani military
headquarters. The first one, on December 14, failed because the
jamming device carried by the President's convoy prevented the transmission
of the detonation signal to the explosives placed under a bridge.
The fact that explosives were placed under a bridge along the route
of General Musharraf's motorcade and that the second time around,
the terrorists' vehicles could access his convoy in a zone where
not the slightest movement can escape detection, is baffling.
The
crucial question for investigators is how the assailants penetrated
the President's security. There is serious concern over the precision
with which the terrorists have been able to time their attacks on
Musharraf's cavalcade. And that too twice, almost at the same spot
in a high security area. At the time of the Christmas incident there
were two motorcades moving simultaneously on different routes, but
the assassins knew precisely which one was being used by the President.
"In
both the attempts it seems the perpetrators had the assistance of
experts and were given tracking and other devices not usually available
to local terrorists," said Najmuddin Sheikh, a former foreign
secretary. The latest attempt was the most serious of the three
attempts on his life since General Musharraf joined the US-led war
on terrorism, which has so angered the Islamic militants. "They
almost got the President," said a security official.
Pakistani security officials said the attack was professionally
planned and seemed to be the work of a well-organised terrorist
network. "Both the attacks carried the hallmark of international
terrorism," says a security official. Suspicion falls on Al
Qaeda, after Osama bin Laden's deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, in a recent
audio-taped message aired by an Arab television channel, called
upon Pakistanis to overthrow Musharraf for supporting America. The
group is furious with Musharraf for supporting the US - led war
in which Pakistan arrested hundreds of Al Qaeda militants and handed
them over to the United States.
Pakistani security authorities have identified a Kashmiri
militant as one of the suicide bombers. Muhammad Jamil, from Pakistani
controlled Kashmir was linked with an outlawed Islamic militant
group that has close ties with Al Qaeda and Afghanistan's Taliban
movement. The other assailant is suspected to be an Afghan national.
Jamil is an activist of Jaish-i-Mohammed, the fiercest militant
outfit fighting Indian forces in the disputed state of Kashmir.
The group, which was outlawed by President Musharraf, has been involved
in a series of terrorist attacks across Pakistan, including a suicide
car bombing on the American consulate in Karachi last year. Both
the bombers were trained at a former Al Qaeda camp in Rishkor near
Kabul.
Twenty-three-old Jamil was arrested fighting against the
US-led coalition forces, but was later released along with hundreds
of Pakistani fighters by President Karzai's government in April.
Not surprisingly, Pakistani intelligence agencies, with their long
association with militant groups, cleared the young man of any anti-state
activities and allowed him to rejoin his outfit.
The suspected involvement of a Kashmiri militant in the suicide
bombing on the eve of a crucial South Asian summit conference in
Islamabad, which is also being attended by Indian Prime Minister,
Atal Bihari Vajpayee, has raised questions about the motives behind
the attack.
Musharraf's
recent peace overtures with India and attempts to resolve the protracted
dispute with India over Kashmir, has further infuriated the Islamic
militants who see him as "a traitor to the cause of jihad."
Earlier this month Musharraf said he was prepared to drop Pakistan's
long-standing demand of holding a plebiscite in the disputed territory
in line with the UN Security Council resolution of 1948. This is
the first time that a Pakistani ruler showed such flexibility on
an issue which has, for the past five decades, been the centre of
hostility between the two South Asian nuclear powers. "The
anger towards Musharraf and his policies is natural," says
a Kashmiri guerrilla leader. "We have lost so many friends,
brothers and relatives in the Kashmir struggle. What was that for?
We are not going to sit quietly."
The attack has also raised new concerns over General Musharraf's
security. What is more alarming is that the assailants chose the
same spot for both attacks. That particular road is used nearly
every day by General Musharraf as he travels from his residence
to his presidential offices in Islamabad. Security is always tight
when Musharraf travels, with roads closed to allow his long motorcade
and the heavily armed soldiers surrounding his vehicle to pass.
Security around the country was even more vigilant on that day as
Pakistan's tiny Christian community celebrated Christmas.
Most analysts contend there has been a serious security breach
as the attackers have, in less than two weeks, managed to penetrate
the heart of a highly fortified army cantonment twice. "There
has definitely been a security lapse," said information minister
Sheikh Rashid Ahmed. Security around the President has been totally
overhauled after the December 14 bomb attack.
Defence sources appear convinced that certain elements within
the army or intelligence agencies may have either encouraged or
tacitly allowed such threats to materialise. "Musharraf is
viewed as having sacrificed Pakistan's national security interest,"
says a retired military official. The attempts on General Musharraf's
life came amid reports of simmering dissent in army ranks. Last
month, an anti-Musharraf opposition leader circulated a letter purportedly
written by some army officers criticising the President for his
pro-west policies. Javed Hashmi, president of the liberal Alliance
for Democracy, has been arrested and is being tried on sedition
charges.
These reports are, perhaps, not without foundation. A few
months back, several army officers were arrested for alleged links
with radical Islamic groups. One of the detained officers had also
given shelter to Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, a top Al Qaeda leader,
in his home in a restricted cantonment area in the North West Frontier
province. Muhammad was arrested last April from a house in the Rawalpindi
cantonment.
According to military sources, there is a growing anti-Musharraf
sentiment among the middle and lower ranking officers who are infuriated
with his support for the United States in the war on terrorism.
"There is a large group of retired Islamist generals and former
intelligence officials who may also have been involved in the plot,"
says a retired general.
Besides
his peace move on Kashmir, it is Musharraf's perceived compromise
on Pakistan's nuclear assets - manifest in the manner in which top
scientists at the main nuclear facility were detained for questioning
for their alleged links with Iran's nuclear programme - which fuels
dissent.
Last
month Pakistani security agencies detained for questioning Muhammed
Farooq, a director at the Khan Research Laboratories (KRL), and
Yasin Chohan , both key players in Pakistan's successful nuclear
tests in 1988. Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear
bomb was also "debriefed" after the disclosure that some
Pakistani scientists may have sold critical technology to enrich
uranium to Iran, Libya and possibly to North Korea.
Dr.
Khan is the former head of KRL, named after him. Situated at Kahuta,
some 30 miles from Islamabad, it is the country's main nuclear weapons
facility where uranium is enriched. It also runs Pakistan's missile
programme which has been developed with the help of North Korea.
The United States clamped sanctions on KRL in March for "material
contribution to the efforts of a foreign country and acquiring missiles
capable of delivering mass destruction."
The
arrests have provoked intense criticism from retired military generals
who have accused the government of targeting the scientists under
foreign pressure. "The arrest of scientists associated with
the country's security on America's behest is alarming" says
General Aslam Beg, a former army chief. "There is no indication
that Musharraf will change course after the assassination attempts,"
said General Masood.
Defence
analysts believe that the ground swell in his popularity after the
assassination attempt will strengthen Musharraf's hand in dealing
with militancy. "Musharraf knows that a reversal in his policy
against militancy will not make his life safer. There is no going
back for him," said Rifaat Hussain, a defence analyst.
Political
analysts and western diplomats fear that if Musharraf is eliminated,
it would affect the international campaign against terror, the stability
of Afghanistan and disrupt the process of normalisation that India
and Pakistan have recently begun. "There will be much chaos
and a period of uncertainty if Musharraf is killed," says General
Masood. "The military will try to hold the country together.
But it will take a while for the new man in to assert his leadership."
Military
analysts in Islamabad, however, discount the prospects of an Islamist
takeover, pointing out that pro-Western generals are next in line
to succeed Pervez Musharraf. General Mohammed Yousuf, the current
vice-chief of the Pakistani army, who is widely seen as maintaining
Islamabad's pro-US policies, has been tipped to take over from Musharraf.
The majority of the other senior officers under General Musharraf
are also seen as liberal and pro-US.
There
is, however, an apprehension that religious elements will try to
exploit the situation and try to force the new man to reverse his
predecessor's course. "There will be a struggle between the
mullahs and the moderates as to which course Pakistan should pursue,"
says Rifaat Hussain. Though Musharraf still has a year left in uniform,
it promises to be a year of living dangerously.
|