|
Q:
Have you ever thought of casting your father in your movies?
A:
That's an unusual question - no one has ever asked me that before!
I've thought of it very often. In fact, many times there have been
roles that I've thought would be perfect for him and I've pestered
him to do them, but the fact is that though I know he is brilliant
when enacting a scene as a director, the minute the camera comes
on, he becomes extremely self-conscious. I've never pushed him because
I know it would be sheer torture for him.
Q: How has it been working with your father as a director?
A:
I began with him, so I don't know any other way. He is the kind
of director that creates an environment in which his actors feel
very comfortable. In fact, I probably got the worst of it because
every time he couldn't shout at anyone else, he'd turn around and
scream at me! We've had our share of fights too, because I would
want to leave a shot half-way and he would tell me to trust myself,
give a bad shot rather than constantly make attempts at greatness,
and that's when I learnt to let go.
Q: What made you launch a new production company when
you had previous successes from your old one?
A: Well, till recently I was running a company called
Pooja Bhatt Productions in tandem with my uncle, Mukesh Bhatt. I
felt the need to branch out and start an independent company because
even when your family is as supportive as mine, you need to move
out in order to find your own voice and individuality. I felt most
of the movies I was making earlier reflected my uncle's personality.
Women have an eye for detailing and can turn around a set in a limited
budget because they are used to doing it around their homes. I wanted
to find my own world, hence launched Fish Eye Network, and since
then have produced films like Sur and Jism which have earned me
credibility.
Q:
So was there any rift between you and your uncle?
A:
Not a rift, but a clash of ideologies. He is still very accessible
to me and whenever I need advice, I go to him. But, what I was basically
against was the archaic way of working, which most production houses
at the time, including ours, adopted. I believe in transparency
and accountability. Also, Mukesh is a businessman and believes in
hard-core commercial movies, which is fine, but I don't want that.
I would rather have modest success and would prefer to make a movie
that can change things.
Q: You keep saying that you haven't given up acting,
but at the same time you haven't been seen on the screen for a while.
Why is that?
A: I acted in Zakhm in 1999 and then I did a film
last year called Everybody says I 'm fine. But, the fact is that
at 17 I did Daddy, and by 21 was the biggest star I could ever imagine
myself to be and was independent financially, and at 22, was saying,
'now what?' I needed some satisfaction creatively and for me an
acting career has to be a challenge. I don't want to be in a film
just because it is a commercial set-up or someone is giving me X
amount of money. I'd rather make that money by taking a chance as
a film-maker.
As an actor, I am only good with certain kinds of roles.
I was never meant to be a glamour girl - although I have no problems
with that and have the greatest respect for Madhuri and Sri Devi,
etc. - but that is not me. As long as I am given a role I find interesting
and unique, which makes me feel that I can push my limit as an actress,
I am prepared to do it. I am 31 years old, can't hope to compete
with someone who is 21, and shouldn't. I couldn't be the conventional
Indian heroine at 25 and have no intention of being that at 31.
And, quite honestly, for the next two years my priority is my company
because there is nobody else to fall back on, so I can't just disappear
for 50 days with my company's work-load pressure because it would
be doing great injustice to both sides. So, if it's a 15-20 days
cameo role, sure I can make the time.
Q: Which was your most challenging role?
A: My role in Zakhm was by far the most challenging,
for it brought with it the pressure of playing a woman who is so
relevant to my father's life, and was a demanding role professionally.
Through the movie, I discovered that my grandmother was a really
tough cookie. It was not what she did or didn't do so much as how
she did it. There was so much angst that the family put up with
but the face she projected was always one of dignity and of being
in control. They don't make women like that any more.
Q: What are your immediate plans regarding film production?
A: I've just finished making Paap and until the
film releases, it isn't really behind me. Soon after that I'm going
to be starting another film which my father will be writing for
me and which will star my brother. We are casting him although he
didn't really want to be an actor. I am an incurable romantic at
heart, so it is a love story. Then I'm going to take a holiday!
Q: Do you concur with your father that one should invest
in memories and make autobiographical movies?
A: I have great admiration for people who can write
books about their lives or make movies about it because I know what
it takes. As an actor you have to revisit parts of your life in
order to evoke emotions from your audience and it is an exhausting
process. However, we can hide behind the character and get away
with it. But as a film-maker, you can't hide behind anyone.
Also, if you have a life that is rich and can tell that tale
articulately, then hats off to you. I would be extremely vain to
want to tell my story because I haven't even led two per cent of
the life my father has. I've had the privilege of having parents
like my father and mother and so didn't have to grow up before my
time like he did. If 20 years down the line or even five, for that
matter, I feel that I do have something to say about my life that
is worth saying and have the courage to say it, I might, but right
now I don't think I have a personal story to tell. I have a lot
of living to do to even attempt making a film like Zakhm.
|