|
It
took a decision by a nine-member bench of the Supreme Court and
the reversal of the much-trumpeted privatisation of Pakistan Steel
Mills for the Prime Minister to revive the long-awaited Council
of Common Interests (CCI). In the wake of the Supreme Court decision,
Shaukat Aziz convened a press conference to announce that he had
forwarded the recommendation for the vital but so far dormant council
to the presidency. Interestingly, he remained tight-lipped about
the names, perhaps in a bid to save face in case some of his nominees
were dropped from the list.
The
birth of the CCI marks the opening of a brand new chapter of controversy,
with the military regime feeling the heat ahead of a challenging
election year.
The
government was not as lucky in the case of Pakistan Steel Mills
as it had been with regard to certain other privatisation deals.
No doubt, the endgames of the PTCL and KESC deals were also embarrassing
for the government, as was the pullout by the highest bidder in
the Pak-American Fertiliser case. Thanks to the proactive workers
of the steel mills, however, this hurriedly reached deal was reversed
by the court decision.
Pakistan
Steel Mills was to be handed over to the Arif Habib Consortium on
May 29 for Rs 21.68 billion at Rs 16.8 per share. The consortium
was supposed to acquire 75 per cent shares of the Steel Mills with
management control, 4,457 acres of land with developed infrastructure
including 110-kilometre metalled roads, a 70-kilometre railway track,
a 165-megawatt power plant, a water treatment plant and a jetty.
However,
the Supreme Court while halting the transfer of possession to the
bidders, stayed the process of privatisation, first on May 24, till
June 15 and then on June 14, pending a final decision on the case.
The consortium comprises the Tuwairqi Steel Mills, the Magni
Togorsk Iron & Steel and Arif Habib Securities. The chairman,
Watan Party barrister, Zafarullah Khan was the main petitioner in
the case challenging the deal, for which the chief justice had constituted
the larger bench.
The
nine-member Supreme Court, after back-to-back hearings over the
past few weeks, finally declared the sale of Pakistan Steel Mills
to the three-party consortium null and void. Instead, it ordered
the government to refer the matter to the CCI within six weeks.
It was indeed a shock to the government, which had already claimed
credit for its successful privatisation policy during the Parliament's
budget session. The reversal of the $362 million deal left the Russian-Saudi-Pakistani
investors, as well as the government, in a state of absolute shock.
"The
March 31 Letter of Acceptance (LOA) and April 24 Share Purchase
Agreement (SPA) with the bidders are declared to be void and of
no legal effect," the chief justice announced in a packed courtroom,
marking the conclusion of four weeks of consecutive hearing.
The
Privatisation Commission Ordinance 2000 was, however, not held as
being against the Constitution, but the apex court's short order
said the process of PSM's privatisation stood vitiated by acts of
omission and commission on the part of certain state functionaries,
reflecting a violation of mandatory provisions of law and the rules.
This
adversely affected decisions like pre-qualifying a member of the
successful consortium (Arif Habib), valuation of the project and
the final terms offered to the successful bidders, which were not
in accord with the initial public offering given through advertisement,
the short order said.
The decision read: "We hold that the establishment and working
of CCI was a cornerstone of the federal structure, which provided
for protection of the rights of the federating units. Mindful that
this important institution (CCI) is not functioning presently and
taking note of the statement of Advocate Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, who
is representing the federal government, that the process for making
it functional was underway, we direct the federal government to
do the needful expeditiously as far as possible, but not later than
six weeks."
"However,
the approval for the privatisation of PSM by the CCI on May 29,
1997 continues to hold the field."
"In view of the developments having taken place during the
intervening period and the divergent stand taken by the counsel
for the federal government that this approval was never recalled
and the stand taken by the steel mills' counsel that the matter
of its privatisation was dropped subsequently, it would be in order
if the matter is referred to CCI for consideration."
On illegalities, the court noted that pre-qualified parties - the
Arif Habib Group of Companies and Al-Tuwairqi Group of Companies
- had entered into a consortium before the bidding process, but
the third party, Magnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works Russia, joined
hands with the consortium on the day of the bidding.
It also questioned the ORE-qualification of Arif Habib, a member
of the successful consortium, who had been accused of being the
largest beneficiary of the stock exchange crash in March, and has
three damage lawsuits, three investigations and a first information
report (FIR) in a criminal case pending against it. The Privatisation
Commission Board had recommended the sale of PSM at Rs 17.43 per
share, but the Cabinet Committee on Privatisation had determined
the reference price at Rs 16.18 per share. The court questioned
the low reference price set by the cabinet. It also said that the
4,457 acres of land, which was part of the Steel Mills, had not
been included in its evaluation.
Since the bid offered by this consortium was found to be higher
than the bid of other competitors, it was accepted and the LOA was
issued on the same day, March 31, 2006, followed by the agreement
on April 24.
The order noted that the privatisation commission had extended benefits
to the purchasers like handing over the stock in trade in the units
worth Rs10 billion and cash worth Rs8.559 billion lying in its account
out of which post-dated cheques for about Rs7.67 billion had already
been issued to clear the liability of loans, which were due for
the years 2013 to 2019. Likewise, the tax of Rs3 billion has already
been paid, out of which Rs1 billion will be refunded to the purchaser
on taking over the unit. Thus the total loss incurred by the government
in this manner works out to Rs18 billion. Above all, the government
has accepted the liability to pay compensation of Rs15 billion to
workers under the golden handshake scheme, the order said.
The short order also holds that it is not the function of the court,
ordinarily, to interfere in the policy-making domain of the executive.
"However, the process of privatisation of the PSMC stands vitiated
by acts of omissions and commissions on the part of certain State
functionaries reflecting violation of mandatory provisions of the
law and rules framed under these, which adversely affected the decisions,
pre-qualification of a member of the successful consortium (Arif
Habib), valuation of the project and the final terms offered to
the successful consortium, which were not in accordance with the
initial public offer given through advertisement," the court
held.
Barrister Zafarullah Khan of the Watan Party - who had challenged
the sale of 75 per cent stake and handing over of management control
of the PSM to the consortium comprising Russian Magnitogorsk, Saudi
Al-Tuwairqi and Arif Habib Securities for $362 million (Rs21.68
billion) at a rate of Rs16.8 per share - told reporters after the
unanimous verdict: "The decision will prove to be a source
of strength for the people of Pakistan, help build the image of
the judiciary and further strengthen its independence."
Many
analysts, as well as government officials,fear the Supreme Court
verdict against one privatisation decision would be read as a reversal
of the entire privatisation process, thus opening a Pandora's box
of petitions challenging every single sale made since the early
1990s.
Since
1991, 160 transactions have taken place, netting a total of Rs 395
billion. There have been repeated delays, too. It was only in 2002
that privatisation picked up again and since then 33 deals amounting
to Rs 302 billion have been completed.
Most
agree that the decision may also augur well with the investment
climate as the Supreme Court has conditioned each new privatisation
with the approval of the CCI.
However,
there are strong voices within the bureaucracy as well as the treasury
benches that have privately asked for revision or scrutiny of other
deals such as those involving PTCL and KESC.
The
government had gone many extra miles to please Etisalat, the highest
bidder for PTCL, which has been using delaying tactics in fulfilling
its financial commitments towards the privatisation of the telecommunication
corporation.
Constitutionally
speaking, an unsettled matter in the CCI is required to go to a
joint session of parliament which would then debate the fate of
an under consideration deal. Keeping in mind the high gear approach
of the government, the long constitutional route to privatisation,
especially of entities like Pakistan Steel, amounts to a 'mere waste
of time.'
The
backers of the privatisation process fear nasty consequences to
a timely policy just because of one shadowy deal. The bloc believes
that the Supreme Court decision may scare off future bidders who
will now think that no final deal in Pakistan is really final. For
them, the privatisation process may fall prey to disgruntled losing
bidders and 'status quo' friendly labour unions.
Certain
circles analyse the reversal of the PSM privatisation in the context
of national security on the basis of published reports that an Indian-born
steel baron is keen on acquiring the Russian component of the consortium
that purchased the steel mills.
The
opposition, ranging from the PPP to PML(N) and the MMA, has not
only welcomed the reversal of the privatisation deal but also applauds
the creation of the CCI, which General Musharraf always remained
indifferent to. The delayed but inevitable debacle may infuse a
wave of confidence amongst the frustrated labourers and political
activists who have been waiting for such an opportunity to vent
their anger.
The
Pakistani group involved in the shot-down deal has high-powered
connections in Islamabad's power corridors. It is not a coincidence
that the president and prime minister have stopped referring to
the country's investment climate in the light of the changed outlook
in the stock exchange. The shadowy PSM privatisation scam has had
an adverse impact on domestic financial markets and may ring a warning
bell for prospective investors in the future.
|