|
Three
parties, one case. Hot on the heels of the May 12 carnage in Karachi
that left 47 people dead, Imran Khan, chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaaf
(PTI), pronounced that Altaf Hussain, chairman of the Muttahida
Quami Movement (MQM), was responsible for the bloodbath and the
breakdown of law and order in Karachi. Imran Khan also announced
that he would file a case in a UK court, calling for the extradition
of the MQM chief. Former federal interior minister General (r) Naseerullah
Babar, who led the operation against the MQM in Karachi, stepped
in with evidence to bolster Imran Khan's case.
The
MQM took to the streets of Karachi with anti-Khan placards and certain
MQM-dominated areas were plastered with what Imran Khan terms as
"obscene wall chalkings" that played up Imran Khan's alleged
playboy past. A reference seeking Imran Khan's disqualification
from the National Assembly on moral grounds has also been filed
with the speaker, who has promptly forwarded it to the Election
Commission of Pakistan. Amidst all this, President General Pervez
Musharraf has called for "moving forward" and has ruled
out an inquiry into the May 12 killings in Karachi.
Newsline
caught up with Imran Khan and General Babar to get their perspectives
on the possibility of securing MQM supremo Altaf Hussain's conviction
in a London court. We also approached Dr Imran Farooq for his reaction
to the allegations levelled against the MQM by the two, but despite
our repeated reminders, he had failed to respond till our going
to press.
Q: What are the details of the case?
A: I can't divulge too much as my legal counsel has
advised me not to. But broadly speaking, the case is based on four
categories of charges: torture, incitement of violence, money laundering
and terrorism.
Q: Speaking of divulging too much, General Babar has termed
your decision of sharing the evidence with the media as 'amateurish.'
How would you respond to that?
A: Yes, that was a mistake which should not have been
made. Actually, there were one or two people acting as liaisons
between General Babar and myself, and the news got leaked.
Q:
Do you have evidence other than that from General Babar?
A:
We have evidence provided by General Babar, and it all adds
up.
Q:
But isn't that evidence 12 years old?
A:
Yes, but it is still valid. Like I said, it all adds up.
Q:
Will any other evidence be used to prove the alleged involvement
of the MQM in the May 12 incident? For instance, the footage from
TV networks showing MQM activists marauding on streets.
A:It is something that our legal team has to decide,
and then we will decide on how to proceed further.
Q: We? Who are 'we'? Is there any other party or individual
involved in this?
A: No. By 'we', I mean our legal team. Our party is
the only one, and as the chairman of my party, I am filing the case.
Rumours that the intelligence agencies are involved in the filing
of the case are incorrect.
Q: What is the progress on the filing of the case?
A: The legal team, led by a renowned human rights
lawyer and my namesake, Imran Khan, has presented all the evidence
to Scotland Yard. This is the procedure that one has to follow for
registering a case against a British citizen. It is like our FIR
here. Scotland Yard determines if there are sufficient grounds for
a court case or not. However, let me be very clear in saying that
there is no possibility of my not pursuing this to the very end.
If Scotland Yard finds that sufficient grounds to file a case do
not exist, I will, nevertheless, go to court directly. Let there
be no doubt about this.
Q: Your determination
indicates that there has been a lot of planning behind it all.
A:Not at all. It was not planned at all. It is the
direct result of May 12. Ten of my party workers sustained bullet
wounds, and one was in critical condition. Fortunately, he survived.
In such a scenario, I couldn't say, 'Well, tough luck boys.' I had
to do something, and this is what needed to be done because in Pakistan
the judiciary is petrified of the MQM. The MQM is a one-man party
led by Altaf Hussain, who controls his workers through terrorist
tactics. They carry out targeted killings. Who will take any action
against him in Pakistan? In addition, he is fully supported by General
Musharraf.
If you look at my 11-year
political career, I have criticised everyone, from Benazir and Nawaz
Sharif to Farooq Leghari and Musharraf. There was only one man against
whom I did not speak out, and that was Altaf Hussain. For he is
the mafia, and who speaks out against Al Pacino? They have such
a hold in Karachi that my workers would have been sitting ducks.
Q: So are you saying
that the party for justice speaks out selectively for who is right
and who is wrong?
A: You see, we are talking about system changes and
the independence of the judiciary so that people are able to express
their opinion freely and get justice.
In this intimidating environment, no one can afford to be in the
opposition. Anyone who has skeletons in their closets is with the
government.
Q:Are you saying
that the honourable members of the opposition do not have skeletons
in their closets?
A:
I am saying that justice has to prevail, and those answerable to
the people have to be brought to the book.
Q: There are other Pakistanis living in the UK who, allegedly,
have a lot to answer for on counts of justice. Will you be pursuing
them too?
A: That is not my responsibility. That is why the
judiciary of Pakistan needs to be fully independent so that people
can be brought to the book.
Q: If your party
workers had not sustained bullet wounds on May 12, would you have
filed the case?
A:
No. I would have issued statements condemning the incident, but
I would not have filed a case.
Q: Will the reference
filed against you by the MQM have any bearing on your decision to
go ahead with the case?
A:
No. That has no standing and will be soon resolved, as you will
see. However, in case I am awarded 20 years rigorous imprisonment,
I would still go ahead with the case. It is no use blaming Babar
Ghauri, etc. There are only two people to blame for May 12: Musharraf
and Altaf Hussain.
|