| Nurtured
as a child of modernity but evolving as a devotee of tradition,
it is artist Sumaya Durrani’s leap of faith that now gives
substance to her aesthetic expression. Initially trained in
the techniques and philosophies of western art, Durrani got
her bachelors and masters degree in Fine Arts from the University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, in 1985, followed by postgraduate studies
at Sir John Cass School of Art, London till 1987. “No
one questions you when you arrive from the US or Europe, and
I was greeted with a lot of applause – but I am glad the
standing ovation did not go to my head,” she muses while
recounting the reception she was accorded here, as a radical
artist, early in her career.
Today,
in keeping with the Islamic chain of spiritual transmission,
tareeqat ka silsila, she acknowledges Faqir Nasiruddin as her
murshid and seeks direction from her spiritual guide, Syed Imamuddin
Qadri. This transition in thought and attitude is grounded in
Durrani’s eventual realisation that “modernity was
imposed on us (as a people).” Remarking that “modernity
is a very noble strategy except that it happened in another
time for another civilisation for a people who wanted it,”
she feels that “it [modernity] is obsessed with only the
individual and how he can change things – so the individual
is prompted not to surrender,” but rather pushed to constantly
validate his independence with innovations, the more shocking
the better. Recalling the inclusion of her work in a notable
Pakistani women painters’ exhibition, Intelligent Rebellion,
held at Bradford Museum, UK, in 1995, she now wonders what the
‘rebellion’ and defiance was all about and what
meaningful victory it achieved.
While conflict between individual and society is a social reality,
Durrani has moved on to another plane where the individual’s
ability to recognise totality and “to weave into the whole”
is primary. Subscribing to the principles of tauheed (unity
in multiplicity), she is inspired by the Sufi or mystic strand
of Islamic knowledge. In the Islamic order, Shariah dictates
the formal relations of Muslims towards God and their fellows
while Sufism teaches Muslims how to know God in their hearts.
Clarifying her stand, the artist explains that in tareeqat you
obey by choice – “because of love” or chahat.
It is love, not intellect that brings you into the tauheed ka
daira.”
Sumaya
Durrani’s recent art delves in and around the ‘inner
way’ or the spiritual journey towards God. Her Ibn-e-Maryam
print series (2006) dwelt on the Virgin Birth as an article
of faith. Aspiring for nearness, through the mediation of the
Prophet Muhammed (Peace Be Upon Him), was the motivation behind
the subsequent ‘Rukh-e-Mustafa’ print (with glaze)
in which the recurring calligraphic text emphasised tasbih or
vird of Zikr-e-Ilahi. Yet another series under process, Jad-ul-Hasan
wa Husain examines digression and return to the circle of unity,
tauheed ka daira.
Still
focused on the mysteries of the spiritual world, Durrani’s
current exhibition titled ‘Shahab-e-Saqib,’ at Chawkandi
Art, references a Quranic Surah that warns against the snares
of evil spirits. The Surah accentuates how angels manifest the
power of God and how different good is from evil and truth from
falsehood, and speaks of the final extirpation of evil. The
defeat of evil is throughout connected with Revelation, and
in this verse the ranging fight is illustrated by a reference
to the angels in the heaven and to the earlier prophets in our
earthly history.
When
viewed in this context, Durrani’s artworks document the
artist’s personal struggle with inner demons, the eternal
tug of war between forces of good and evil that man encounters
at every stage in his life, and her ability to cleanse and purify
her ‘self.’ She works intuitively, building her
forms on flat painted surfaces that evoke the concept of infinity,
which is a constant, as against the variables of form implanted
on it. In a severely abstract and pointedly geometric visual
idiom, a concentrated fusion of shaded, dark and luminous facets
project the varying levels, degrees or kaifiyat of the soul
as it fluctuates and oscillates between moments of clarity and
illumination, and depths of despair and confusion.
To
the uninitiated viewer, however, her geometric forms speak of
a Cubist trajectory belonging to the manifesto of modern art
because the inherent distinction between the ‘abstract’
nature of Islamic art and western art is not widely understood
or manifest in prevalent art expressions.
“The two stand at opposite poles. The result of one form
of abstraction is the glass skyscrapers which scar most modern
cities and the fruit of the other is the Shah Mosque [in Iran]
and the Taj Mahal. The one seeks to evade the ugliness of naturalistic
and condensed forms of the 19th century European art by appeal
to mathematical abstraction of a purely human and rationalistic
order. The other sees in the archetype residing in the spiritual
empyrean, the concrete realities of which so-called realities
of this world are nothing but shadows and abstractions. It,
therefore, seeks to overcome this shadow by returning to the
direct reflections of the truly concrete world in this world
of illusion and abstraction which the forgetful nature of man
takes for concrete reality. The process of so-called ‘abstraction’
in Islamic art is, therefore, not at all a purely human and
rationalistic process as in modern abstract art, but the fruit
of intellection in its original sense, or vision of the spiritual
world, and an ennobling of matter by recourse to the principles
which descend from the higher levels of cosmic and ultimately
metacosmic reality.” (Excerpt from foreward by Seyyed
Hossein Nasr in Art of Islam: Language and Meaning by Titus
Burkhardt).
For Sumaya Durrani “language is just a vehicle.”
She feels “your vocabulary is determined by what you want
to say and how you want to say it.” For her, the communication
of the ‘essence’ is of primary importance –
the syntax of form is subservient to the portrayal of the experience.
Yet, when we examine the history of Islamic art we are confronted
with a tradition where use and beauty go hand in hand. Titus
Burkhardt argues: “The divorce between ‘art’
and ‘craftsmanship’ is a relatively recent European
phenomenon which parallels the scission between ‘art’
and ‘science.’ Formerly, every artist who produced
an object was called a ‘craftsman,’ and every discipline
which demanded not only theoretical knowledge but also practical
ability was an ‘art.’” Taking into account
Islamic calligraphy, painting, architecture and the plastic
arts, we have evidence of the inner dimension of Islam and see
the role art plays in the life of individual Muslims and the
community as a whole – the role of inspiring the remembrance
and contemplation of God. Islamic artists developed geometric
patterns to a degree of complexity and sophistication previously
unknown. These patterns exemplify the Islamic interest in repetition,
symmetry and continuous generation of pattern. The superb assurance
of the Islamic designers and architects is demonstrated by their
masterful integration of geometry with such optical effects
as the balancing of positive and negative areas, interlacing
with fluid overlapping and under-passing strap work, and a skillful
use of colour and tone values.
For
contemporary artists tutored in the western model of art, the
embrace of Islamic tradition is tantamount to opening up an
alternative space where we see Muslim thought articulated with
modern non-Islamic vocabulary. Sumaya Durrani’s art can
be placed within this hybrid art practice which solicits the
divine, not through the traditional Islamic art methodology
of utility and beauty through symmetry and repetition, but in
the prevalent language of art. This recourse to one’s
roots spells a rejection of Eurocentrism, at least in thought,
if not imagery (as yet), and a conscious effort to seek and
own Islamic tradition as a means of understanding and elevating
the state of the soul or qalb ki kayfiyaat.
Like
artists, viewership here has also been weaned on the formula
of modern art, and a change in sensibility is required for the
assimilation of alternative practices. For an artist to achieve
the goals set out during the creation of artwork, the viewer
of the piece should experience the same passion, inspiration
and spirituality felt by the artist during the creation of the
piece – and such an accomplishment is, by definition,
the origin and purpose of art.
|