Twirling
his moustache, an arrogant young man proudly flaunts his automatic rifle in
public. Next, he is behind bars, the
erstwhile machismo nowhere to be seen, weeping with remorse for not taking
advantage of the government’s 15-day amnesty for surrender of illegal
weapons.
This
was one of the television advertisements aired on behalf of the ministry of
interior over the past few weeks.
National and regional newspapers have also, on an almost daily basis,
been carrying similar quarter-page advertisements exhorting the public to avail
themselves of the government’s ‘arms amnesty drive’ from June 6 to June 20, or
else be prepared to face exemplary punishment.
Besides this, green banners have been put up at numerous places across
the country, warning of dire consequences for those retaining their illegal
weapons beyond the cutoff point.
Despite the frenetic campaign however, which must have cost the
government millions of rupees, the number of weapons surrendered by June 20 is
no more than a drop in the ocean.
According
to the final tally announced by the ministry of interior at the end of its
15-day deadline, a total of 51,074 weapons have been relinquished in all four
provinces. According to the
province-wise break-up, Punjab recorded the highest number of surrendered arms
with 40,496 weapons being handed over, while in the entire Sindh province,
which has been the most volatile of all the four provinces, only 1,113 weapons
were given up (in Karachi, where according to one estimate, the number of
Kalashnikovs alone is said to be 300,000, only 374 weapons of all types were
surrendered). As for the NWFP and
Balochistan, which have been the traditional sources of supply for arms and
ammunition all over the country, only 7,983 and 1,491 weapons respectively have
been surrendered here.
This
is not the first time that an attempt has been made to cleanse society of unlicenced
weapons. The first such drive was
initiated on a massive scale in the mid ’80s in Karachi when a crackdown was
launched targetting Sohrab Goth and other Karachi areas with a predominance of
Pathans, known to be the main suppliers of weapons all over the country. This operation, known as “Operation Sohrab
Goth,” fizzled out without yielding any major breakthrough.
During
her second stint in power, when Benazir Bhutto’s government launched a clean-up
operation, her interior minister Naseerullah Babar, used his connections in the
Frontier to break the weapons supply line.
Babar reportedly offered arms smugglers heavy cash incentives in
exchange for information about their clients in Sindh, especially in the mega
city of Karachi. Says a source, “This strategy proved relatively successful
in as much as the arms flow to Karachi shrank in volume, and several dealers in
the city were identified and apprehended.”
Nawaz
Sharif also launched a deweaponisation campaign in his second term in office,
but it was largely confined to the media and no major operation on the ground
was launched to seize illegal arms.
Apart
from this, raids have been carried out as a matter of course by the police in
all four provinces against arms dealers and anti-social elements, most of which
have rarely yielded more than a small number of illegal weapons. There is general agreement among observers
that none of the governments, including the present one, have ever launched a
well-delineated plan to deweaponise society.
The
present government has notified the Surrender of Illicit Arms Act 1991 to
provide legal cover to the latest crackdown on illegal weapons and to invoke
the stringent penalties contained therein, including life imprisonment for
those in possession of illegal arms.
Said federal interior secretary Tasneem Noorani, “This law, enacted
almost 10 years ago, has been notified to give legal cover to the
deweaponisation campaign and the crackdown,” adding that it had never been invoked
because of the harsh punishments prescribed in it. The government has also announced that cases of those found in
possession of illegal arms will be challaned and referred to the speedy courts
within seven days for quick disposal.
Under
the aforementioned Act, weapons are divided into three different categories and
punishment will be awarded to the accused accordingly. In the first category, life imprisonment and
forfeiture of property will be awarded to those possessing illicit cannons, or
explosive substances as defined in the Pakistan Arms Ordinance of 1965,
including mines of all types, containers, grenades, bombs and shells that
discharge poisonous or noxious gases or other chemicals or substances which
cause bodily harm. In the second category,
imprisonment for life or for a term not less than 10 years will be given to
those possessing firearms comprising automatic weapons (other than machine
guns), including sub-machine guns, automatic rifles and machine pistols. The third and final category carries the
punishment of imprisonment for a term which may extend to 14 years but will not
be less than three years for possessing illicit weapons such as rifles,
carbines, muskets, shotguns, revolvers, pistols and appliances the object of
which is the silencing of firearms.
Ironically
however, this Act is neither applicable in the tribal areas of Balochistan,
which constitute 96 per cent of the province’s total area, nor in the tribally
administered areas of the Frontier province.
Informed
sources believe that rather than awarding harsh punishments alone, a better
overall strategy is required to deter people from retaining and acquiring
weapons illegally. Says one of these
observers, “Not many illegal weapons were surrendered during the 15-day amnesty
scheme because most people don’t believe that the government possesses the
ability to recover them.” When it has
proved unable to to foil strikes by political parties and prevent violence
during these strikes, how can it successfully purge the society of illicit
weapons.
According
to most observers, the persistent failure of Interior Minister Moinuddin
Haider’s plans – from the regulation of Bara markets and alien registration to
the drive against the display of weapons – stems from poor planning. Says one source, “All over the country, not
more than twenty cases against the display of arms have so far been registered
and many influential people continue to openly carry weapons.” The current deweaponisation campaign,
believe cynics, will prove to be a similar exercise in futility.
There
is open defiance to the government’s campaign in some quarters. Addressing a gathering of party workers, the
chief of the Tanzeem-e-Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi, Maulana Shafi Mohammed,
asserted that the people of Malakand division would not surrender their weapons
under the campaign, which he denounced as a US conspiracy against the
Muslims. Until the enforcement of
Shariat in the division, he said, no weapons would be relinquished. “We are ready to embrace martyrdom at the
hands of the government, but shall never surrender to the will of the
infidels.” Likewise, the chief of the Mengal tribe in Balochistan, Attaullah
Mengal, has also directed his tribesmen not to hand over weapons to the
government. “We will die, but we will
not surrender our weapons,” he maintained.
Opposition
notwithstanding, the government has vowed to see its campaign through. According to its strategy, on the basis of
information gathered by the intelligence agencies, night raids will be carried
out to seize illegal weapons and, if necessary, curfew will be imposed in the
targetted areas during the course of recovering the weapons.
Given
the vital role of the police in the practical aspect of its campaign, the
government has announced promotions for Station House Officers (SHOs) on the
basis of successful arms recovery operations in their respective
jurisdictions. Senior police officials,
however, believe that the government has not taken into account the dismal
state of the country’s police force and they express doubts over whether it can
carry out the gargantuan task it has been assigned. Says an official, “The police in Pakistan is a low-paid and
over-worked institution, and also extremely demoralised. Under the present circumstances, it is
unrealistic to expect it to do the job efficiently.” According to another police official, “It is simple to devise
such plans while sitting in a plush office in Islamabad, but when the ground
realities are considered it’s not a practical strategy.”
Compounding
the problem, according to sources, is the fact that not only does the
government have no idea as to the number of illegal weapons in the country, but
also that it has announced no plans to close down the huge arms industry in the
Frontier. Comments a senior government
official, “It’s like persuading people not to smoke while refusing to shut down
the cigarette industry.” According to
one estimate, in Darra Adam Khel in the Frontier province, there are some 6,000
shops dealing in weapons, while the number of people engaged in the business of
manufacturing weapons is around 70,000.
The
Frontier has traditionally been the source of weapons for the entire
country. In fact, even Pathan-dominated
areas of Karachi echo with gunshots during the night. Discloses a source, “This is because arms dealers in these areas
test weapons for prospective buyers in the night hours.” Observers believe that weaponisation has
various social implications and cannot be tackled solely on an administrative
level. “It has not been decided whether
these arms industries will ultimately be closed down, and if so, how will the
thousands of people dependent on the industry for their bread and butter
survive,” says one such observer.
Furthermore,
no strategy has been devised to control the smuggling of arms from one province
to another as the government does not possess the resources to keep a check on
porous provincial limits. Maintains an
official, “Thousands of trucks from upcountry enter Karachi alone and even if
one trucker brings in one weapon, it would defeat the government’s
purpose. It has neither sufficient
manpower nor the resources to unload each truck to check its cargo for smuggled
weapons.”
Aside
from this, sources maintain that the intelligence agencies themselves have
created groups to counter political forces in the country and these are
frequently used against each other; some of these groups have in fact, started
operating independently of the intelligence agencies.
Observers believe that the deweaponisation campaign
would have achieved its objectives if the government had
devised a strategy to cut the weapons supply line as well
as extinguish the militant organisations’ sources of funds. Says one source, “At the moment, they have
enough resources to acquire whatever weapons are needed.”