|
Q:
When the IFPI's enforcement department was created, it estimated
losses of four billion US dollars for member companies. How far
was Pakistan responsible for that?
A: At that time, it was nothing. We estimated nine or 10 operations
in Pakistan, mainly in the Karachi area. Now there is a radical
change. Actual production for 2004 was about 230 million CDs, of
which between 25-30 million were for local consumption. We believe
that the vast majority of that 200 million is exported worldwide
and is going to at least 46 countries
Q: So Pakistan is on top of the priority list?
A: Pakistan belongs to the top 10 countries worldwide
causing a lot of damage to the recording industry.
Q: Is somebody monitoring the export and import of pirated
CDs from Pakistan?
A: Until mid-2004, large quantities went by courier
as hand luggage. There are different ways of shipping, but then
the CBR gave instructions to customs to end this. In many countries
there is always a danger that organised crime is involved. For most
countries, piracy is a low priority crime, but if you look at the
sheer magnitude of exports, even if you have a small profit, it
amounts to millions. I'm not sure what happens to that money but
it's a lot to play around with.
Q: When did IFPI first approach the Pakistani authorities
and what has the response been?
A: We had a discussion with the Pakistani government
about four years ago. I must say there is a positive side. The establishment
of PIPRO, and the appointment of the FIA as the organisation for
the enforcement of the IFPI legislations is a step forward. Several
anti-piracy cells within customs have also proved positive.
Q: So you're satisfied with the actions taken by the
Pakistani government?
A: We are very satisfied with the recent actions taken
by the Pakistani government.
Q: What else needs to be done?
A: The FIA should continue with its enforcement action.
The Pakistani government is on the right track, they realise that
IFPI is not only about a few discs, rather, it affects investments
from international companies. There have been legitimate companies
in Pakistan which have closed down because of the high levels of
piracy. Countries that are serious about enforcing IFPI legislation
are given a certain grace period to get rid of the pirates.
Q: Is the domestic market completely saturated with pirated
goods?
A: The vast majority of the discs sold here are pirated.
None of the record companies, Hollywood studios and international
software associations have, as far as we know, ever authorised Pakistani
plants to manufacture their products.
Q: Are there any investments in the offing by IFPI member
companies on the condition that Pakistan ends piracy?
A:
The legitimate record companies are interested in investing here
because of the sheer size of the market. They haven't come in because
of the piracy levels. Everyone is looking at what's going to happen,
will the plants be closed or will they be re-opened? The number
of plants at the moment are too much for domestic production alone
and I don't see all 10 plants surviving or necessarily becoming
legitimate.
Q: Do think they can become legitimate?
A: If they're really serious about it and taking measures
which all the legitimate plants do worldwide, they can.
Q: Will foreign recording labels invest in the Pakistani
music scene?
A: A record company, at the end of the day, wants
to make money, so if they see a market on Pakistani soil, they will
come.
Q: Was an IFPI task force in the country to investigate
links to organised crime? And was it aided by the U.S. government?
A: I can't say that there was any task force, and
IFPI has nothing to do with the U.S. government. IFPI is an organisation
for the recording industry and that's it.
|