|
When
popularity ratings dip, governments avoid trouble. In today's Pakistan,
it is the exact opposite. Trouble is sought rather than skirted
around. Karachi is a perfect example of this disconnect. Even General
Pervez Musharraf's most clever foes could not have planned and executed
a more successful bid to wreck his near eight-year-old hold over
power. Drenching Karachi in violence, opening up old ethnic wounds,
giving the opposition a new handle to thrash the government with,
scaring away potential investors and earning the ire of international
human rights bodies seems like an ideal centrepiece of any strategy
to besiege the general and erode his political standing.
But
it was not the evil political genius of Musharraf-haters who brought
about this disastrous situation. It was created by the decisions
taken in Islamabad by some of his closest aides, and these decisions
carried his final seal of approval.
The
motive behind the decision to paralyse the country's financial nerve
centre on the eve of the arrival of the chief justice of Pakistan
to address the Sindh High Court Bar Association was to "counter
politics with politics." General Musharraf's advisors, says
a source, played on his personal dismay at the hearty reception
that the chief justice received in Lahore. Justice Iftikhar Muhammad
Chaudhry's caravan had travelled through the Grand Trunk Road in
one of the longest and most riveting media events in national history.
"The president was appalled at this kind of attention being
paid to someone he genuinely believes is a wrongdoer and against
whom a reference of misconduct is pending in court," says the
source.
The
general directed his spleen against the Punjab government, where
the Chaudhries of Gujarat were given the rough end of the stick
for not "blocking the circus." To these charges of "weak-handling"
was added the more serious charge of General Musharraf's friends
not doing enough to promote his name and demonstrate his popularity
among the people. Punjab government sources maintain that they did
not give in to pressure from the centre on this account because
it would have led to severe clashes with the opposition.
"The
opposition is looking for trouble. They want street violence, police
action and agitation. They have seen how quickly this kind of a
reaction from the government makes it unpopular. We did not want
to give them the opportunity and therefore decided that the chief
justice should have his space," says a senior member of the
Punjab government.
Against
the backdrop of Karachi's disastrous developments, where force was
applied to contain the chief justice's reception, this seems like
astute politics. But at the time, the Punjab government had completely
lost favour with Musharraf's advisors, at least one of whom described
it as "good for nothing."
This set the course of the decision on how to tackle the chief justice
in Karachi: he had to be cut down to size, to be told bluntly that
the political bubble of protest that he had created could be punctured
with the slightest pin-prick.
What
got delivered, unfortunately, was much more than a pin-prick: it
was a punch that bloodied the government's own face. The Muttahida
Qaumi Movement that ended up being the public face of violence in
Karachi privately complains of the unfairness of heaping the blame
only at their doorstep. Sources privy to the decision to block the
chief justice's arrival in Karachi have told Newsline that "everyone
was in on it."
"At
one level the decision was very simple. The chief justice and his
political advisors could not be allowed to make headlines and create
the impression that they were the most important force in the country.
If the city had to be brought to a standstill to stop them, so be
it. That day there were to be only two events in the country: the
pro-Musharraf rally in Islamabad, and the anti-chief justice rally
in Karachi," says the source.
There
was another reason for hoisting the government's flag over and above
that of the chief justice's. General Musharraf's legal advisors
had been constantly complaining of the "difficulties judges
of the Supreme Court face with the mounting public sentiment in
favour of the chief justice."
According to one legal source in the President's House, the Supreme
Court has never been placed in a situation, where almost the entire
legal community, the media and the large body of public opinion
expects them to deliver only one type of verdict: clear the chief
justice of the charges of misconduct.
"This is a dangerous situation. The judges cannot take an independent
decision," said the source. Put differently, this 'dangerous
situation' means that if the government's secret hands try to manipulate
the proceedings of the case, the judges will not listen: some because
they are taking heart from the pro-chief justice sentiment; others
because they are losing heart for the same fact and are not open
to the government's friendly 'advice.'
If
Karachi could become the stage where the chief justice's political
supporters could be overrun by an overwhelming show of force by
the MQM, and "lakhs of people" could gather for General
Musharraf on the streets of Islamabad, it would be established beyond
any doubt who the real leader of Pakistan is.
General
Musharraf's close confidants insist that violence in Karachi, much
less murder and mayhem, was never part of the plan.
"Why
would a sitting government stab itself by allowing citizens to be
killed and chaos to rule?" said an irritated federal minister
when interviewed by Newsline on the government's failure to protest
life and limb.
Taking
this logic at face value, and assuming that power politics, even
at its most ruthless, respects life, it has to be said that those
who did not foresee the possibility of violence in Karachi, did
worse than plan it. They were totally unprepared for any eventuality
that would cause Karachi to relapse into the dreaded days of gun-toting
gangsters settling scores in ethnically divided neighbourhoods.
The
obsessive focus on "keeping this man (the chief justice) down
and out," had left no room for any other outcome.This is in
part the reason why everyone in Islamabad remained in a state of
denial for weeks, churlishly laying the blame of the violence at
the doorstep of the lawyers, the political opposition, the chief
justice and his legal advisors.
There
is limited merit in the suggestion that an announcement from the
chief justice's advisors about the cancellation of their visit could
have helped to defuse tensions. However, it is hard to imagine how
the spectre of killings and an elaborate preparation for the exhibition
of force could have simply disappeared with an announcement like
that. The opposition would have stayed on the streets, and the lawyers
would still have protested, perhaps even more strongly than they
did as they waited late into the night for him to arrive at the
airport.
In
the immediate aftermath of the events of May 12, there was no hard-nosed
analysis of the monumental folly of opening up the barely-shut door
of militant politics in an exceedingly volatile city. Nor of the
dangers inherent in politically sanctioning a show of force, which
can only provoke counter-force and imperil law and order.
This stance allowed the violence of May 12 to spill over into the
next 48 hours, claiming more lives and poisoning Karachi's body-politic
with revengeful, divisive and ethnically motivated hate.
It was the MQM that touched off a concerted attempt at damage-limitation,
which is shoddy at worst and partially effective at best.
Taking the better part first, the initial hints of a judicial inquiry
into the tragedy created an expectation that the government was
open to fixing the blame where it belongs. While the track record
of previous inquiries did not inspire much hope, at a critical point
when tempers were flying high, such an inquiry could have gone some
way in easing tense nerves.
Similarly, the governor's call to the Rangers, allowing them widespread
powers to shoot down miscreants, did check the possibility of heightened
violence. On the political front, General Musharraf's usual trouble-shooters
tried to reach out to the Pashtoons in order to pacify them, asking
them not to hammer too hard the point that the Pathans were the
specific target of the May 12 killings. Since then, while the Awami
National Party has been relentlessly critical of the MQM, its leaders
have not specifically spoken of Pashtoon persecution.
The provincial government, particularly the city Nazim, has also
restarted the campaign of making Karachi a financial hub, sending
out signals to petrified investors that May 12 was an aberration,
and not a sign of things to come. The governor's act of reaching
out to the opposition was meant to douse the fire of anger and hurt.
But even these small attempts at retrieving a dangerously messed-up
situation lie in tatters, now that the option of holding an inquiry
has been practically discarded on the flimsy grounds that it would
create rather than solve the problem. In effect, the government
is saying that the killing of dozens of innocent citizens and the
loss of limb, property and national image are not worth probing
into. In common parlance this is known as a cover-up.
Perhaps the government does not want to probe too deeply into the
Karachi situation because this city has become another name for
the multiplying domestic problems that are nibbling at Musharraf's
power base, unhinging the aplomb with which he wielded unbridled
power, and widening the scope of the opposition's politics of agitation.
The more President Musharraf tries to avoid Karachi's grim realities,
the more the opposition's vicious attacks on his ethnic background
aggravate the situation. As it is, this issue has put him on the
defensive: the opposition claims that he is going out of his way
to defend the MQM, instead of keeping a more balanced and nuanced
stance on the issue of the killings.
His main support-base, the Pakistan Muslim League (Q) in the Punjab,
is not entirely comfortable with his demand for a more forceful
defence of the MQM in the parliament and in the media. Already cheesed
off with the MQM's attempts to enter Punjab politics, the pro-Musharraf
Leaguers are quietly letting their coalition partners take the heat
of criticism. The bolder among them have spoken candidly with the
president, suggesting that an explicitly pro-MQM posture could undermine
his standing in the Punjab. For their part, the Pashtoon members
of the federal cabinet, too, have been exceedingly unhappy with
the Karachi developments and, at least privately, hold the MQM responsible
for the mayhem.
Seeing knives out all around, MQM leaders seem to have worked out
a back-up plan. Instead of taking it lying down, they could reconsider
their association with the present set-up. Or at least put the threat
of jumping ship out in the open if they get pushed and shoved around.
Meanwhile, the whole Musharraf camp seems to have been broken into
feuding camps, each claiming its pound of flesh from the skeletal
structure of authority that the president controls.
Above this landscape of self-destructive struggle hangs the ominous
cloud of Karachi re-living the horror of May 12. In Islamabad, the
army top-brass put fingers in their ears whenever the term 'ethnic
strife' is mentioned. However, theirs refusal to ackowledge this
reality will not make it go away. The hard fact is that Karachi's
politics have taken a turn towards ethnicity, and while its articulation
by different groups may have been muted at this point, their future
course of action is clear.
The other divide, between the Jamaat-e-Islami and the MQM, has also
been cemented with an additional coating of hatred. Both have accused
each other of killing party workers and have vowed revenge. Given
the circumstances, Pashtoon nationalists may stand with the Jamaat's
Pashtoon component in Karachi to take on the MQM. Again, as in the
nineties, Karachi has become a ticking bomb that can blow up in
the country's face. And those ruling Islamabad are still indulging
in the self-deluding propaganda that all is well.
|