January 28, 2001: Around 12 noon, four armed men attack
a van belonging to the Darul Uloom Farooqia in Shah Faisal Colony.
Five, including teachers and students of the madrassa and
the van driver, are killed in the ensuing carnage and four others
injured. The assailants, activists of a Shia organisation,
are arrested.
February 5, 2001: A group of people seated near the Hussaini
Blood Bank in Soldier Bazaar are caught unawares when an armed
gang arrives at the spot and opens fire.
Two men, one of them the finance secretary of a Shia sectarian
party, are killed. One man is arrested but later released for want of evidence. No further arrests have been made…
February 21, 2001: Surrounded
by a posse of armed henchmen, Shoaib Khan ‘Rummyclubwala,’ whose
sobriquet refers to the string of plush gambling dens he runs
in Karachi, steps out of his car in the city court premises.
He has arrived to seek bail before arrest in an FIR lodged
against him for kidnapping. A few minutes later, all hell breaks loose
as members of a rival gang, whose leader Shoaib Khan had allegedly
kidnapped, open fire. In
the shootout that follows, five people are seriously wounded.
Despite the heavy presence of the rangers and police in
the area, no arrests are made.
The continuing tension between the two sides can explode
in another deadly confrontation any time...
February 22, 2001: DSP
(retd.) Syed Sadiq Hussain Shah and his son, constable Abid Hussain
Shah, idly stand by their vehicle while it is being repaired at
a mechanic in Madina Market, Malir. Four armed men suddenly appear on the scene
and with cold precision, aim their weapons at the father and son. Within minutes, both are dead. Two of the killers, who belong to the Sipah-e-Sahaba,
are subsequently arrested...
March 19, 2001: The residence of an additional and sessions judge is broken into
at dawn by three armed intruders, reportedly Bengalis. The judge, her husband and two of her children
are taken hostage. When
the police arrive on the scene, mayhem ensues, and in the exchange
of gunfire between the dacoits and police, the two young children
are shot dead. One dacoit is injured and dies later in hospital.
The other two are still at large...
May 18, 2001: In
Baldia Town, Maulana Saleem Qadri, chief of the Sunni Tehreek,
is proceeding for Juma prayers with several others in a van.
Six armed men on three motorcycles ambush the vehicle and
fire upon its occupants. Maulana Qadri and five of his companions are
killed. Three others are
injured. While one of the assailants is killed in the
encounter, five escape from the scene.
They have not yet been apprehended...
Welcome to Karachi’s underworld.
A world of vice and greed, a world inhabited by smugglers,
gunmen, dacoits and kidnappers.
A world that thrives on the patronage of shadowy intelligence
agencies and political parties who turn to them for maintaining
their spheres of influence. Police ineptitude and corruption completes the deadly nexus that
has kept Karachi reeling from a crime spree that has blighted
the lives of its citizens.
According to official
figures, from 1994 to April 2001, a total of 3,978 people have
been murdered in the city with the year 1995 claiming the highest
number of victims at 1742. From
April 1, 2000, to March 31, 2001, there were a total of 2975 house
robberies and dacoities reported in Karachi.
Meanwhile, the number of four wheelers reported stolen
during the same period in the city was 3586.
It is believed that a large number of mafia groups are active
in present-day Karachi. They
include militant/terrorist wings of political parties and newly
cobbled together gangs of hired assassins (most of whom belong
to breakaway factions of these militant wings), as well as land-grabbers,
drug traffickers, gun-runners, and, last but not least, state
agencies. According to
official sources, there are currently 217 known terrorists belonging
to various political parties operating in the city today.
The recent assassination of Maulana Saleem Qadri is the latest
in a series of killings labelled terrorist crimes. In police parlance, these include crimes such as sectarian/ethnic
murders, indiscriminate firing in public places and bomb blasts. On the other hand, “ordinary” or “plain” crime
includes drug trafficking/marketing, kidnapping for ransom, vehicle
lifting, dacoity – in short, says a police source, “crimes in
which a hidden hand is not suspected.”
However, in many instances, car lifting is the first step
in the commission of another crime or an act of terrorism.
Law enforcement officials maintain that while car snatching/lifting
and kidnapping for ransom is usually the preserve of gangs belonging
to interior Sindh, terrorist crimes are carried out largely by
criminals within the MQM, Haqiqi, Jiye Sindh, AZO, Sipah-e-Sahaba,
Lashkar-i-Jhangvi and Sipah-e-Mohammed.
The Sipah-e- Sahaba, MQM and Haqiqi are also cited as frequent
perpetrators of house robberies.
Until the late ’70s, Karachi’s law and order problem was
a contained one as the city followed a measured rate of growth.
However, its reputation as Pakistan’s economic jugular
has, over the years, increasingly attracted an influx of people
from rural areas as well as other countries such as Burma, Bangladesh
and later, Afghanistan. Most settled in Karachi’s shanty towns or katchi
abadis. Out of the 1800
square kilometres that comprise the total area of Karachi, these
shanty towns today occupy 303 kilometres or 16.83 per cent while
their resident population is estimated at 37 per cent of the metropolis’
entire population. Without a corresponding increase in its civic
facilities and law enforcement machinery and, as a corollary of
the ruthless political culture that entrenched itself in the country,
Karachi began its descent into lawlessness from which it has emerged
only sporadically.
The turning point in the law and order situation in the
country, particularly in Sindh, can be traced to the imposition
of martial law in 1977 by General Zia.
The Afghan Saur revolution followed soon after in 1978
and within no time, the country was awash with all kinds of weapons,
from ordinary pistols to Kalashnikovs, rocket launchers and night
vision guns. Suddenly,
it seemed that everyone, whether criminal, college student or political party activist, was brandishing these weapons. However, while the Afghan war made weapons
available, it was the Pakistan government that liberalised the
issuance of arms licences and thereby created the demand for them.
It is believed that weapons were initially supplied under
official patronage to elements opposed to the PPP with the intention
of rooting out the party, which enjoyed the most popularity at
the time. Says a senior
journalist, “General Zia had asked one of his think tanks in Sindh
to devise a strategy to counter the PPP’s popularity. He was told that the proliferation of arms
and exploitation of the criminal segment of society in Sindh would
achieve the desired objective.”
Thus was initiated a process whereby politics was criminalised
and the intelligence agencies assumed an active role in steering
the country’s political direction.
Former caretaker Prime Minister Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi, is
on record saying that arms were supplied to various parts of the
country in NLC trailers during these years.
A former bureaucrat recalls, “In 1981, we seized a huge
cache of arms on the Super Highway near Karachi. Immediately thereafter, we were inundated with
urgent messages from people at the top to release the weapons
without delay.”
A police source says, “Following the inception of the MRD
movement in 1983, intelligence agency sleuths began patronising
and harbouring criminals. In order to keep tabs on political activity,
they developed contacts even with the lower cadres of political
parties, particularly in Sindh, because the intensity of the movement
was greatest in this province.”
Even after General Zia’s death, the proliferation of arms
and patronage of criminals continued.
According to a police official, “In 1991, we arrested an
MQM activist from Hyderabad and recovered a Kalashnikov from his
possession. He disclosed
to the joint interrogation team that Kalashnikovs were supplied
to his party workers by officials in khaki.
Interestingly, the boy was released within a month’s time
while the inquiry report of the incident later disappeared from
official records.”
Cash flow problems experienced by the numerous ethnic and
sectarian parties that had emerged in the 1980s also contributed
to the rising crime graph. Says a party activist, “Most of these parties
indulged in crime, ranging from kidnapping for ransom to extortion
and house robberies, to finance their political activities.” The lower cadres of the parties were instructed
not only to run the sub-divisional offices with the money collected
through these means but also to inject funds into the head offices. In the process, the modus operandi of acquiring
and disbursing funds was organised and streamlined. The very survival of many parties depended
upon its criminal activities.
According to a source, “In Karachi, the real power in the
MQM was wielded not by its MNAs and MPAs, but its ‘in charge’
at the unit and sector levels, because they were the ones who
were financing the party.” These
offices were often held by unemployed youth who were picked up
from the streets, and for whom this was their first heady taste
of power.
Many political parties also believed that militancy was
the only means to achieve their aims.
The first one to adopt this line of action was Al Zulfikar.
Sources maintain that criminalisation in politics was initiated
by the AZO when it began dispatching its activists
indiscriminately to training camps abroad for what was essentially
commando training. Other
parties soon followed suit. A
former activist discloses, “I later found out that the leaders
of these militant organisations used to get cash handouts from
Indian authorities according to the strength of their trained
youth.” Little wonder
then that the militant parties also sent hardened criminals by
the truckloads to training camps abroad in return for greater
financial reward. Points out one source, “The commitment of these
trained youth to their parent organisations can be gauged by the
fact that when Murtaza Bhutto was murdered, none of his party
activists, many of whom had received training in India and Afghanistan,
tried to avenge his killing.”
Terrorists affiliated with political parties have been
cited for their involvement in a litany of crimes – road robberies,
bank and house dacoities, kidnappings and murder.
A case in point is Bahawal Deshak, a Jiye Sindh Taraqqi
Pasand activist, who was involved in the kidnapping of former
Sindh law minister Pir Mazhar-ul-Haq. Deshak was killed in an armed encounter with
the police near Naushero Feroz.
It is also a known fact that Amirullah and Fasih who have
recently been convicted for the murder of Hakim Saeed belong to
the MQM.
While the MQM had been propped up in the early 1980s to
counter the Jamaat-i-Islami in Karachi, the formation of the Haqiqi
was later engineered to rein in the MQM.
The role of the intelligence agencies in the creation of
both was no secret. According to an official in a federal law-enforcement agency, “The
police on one occasion apprehended a Haqiqi activist for being
in possession of three Kalashnikovs.
A senior army man promptly called up requesting his release
on the grounds that he was ‘working for Pakistan.’”
A few years ago, the MQM had kidnapped some activists belonging
to the People’s Students Federation (PSF).
In retaliation, the PSF kidnapped some MQM workers. The standoff was resolved when the director general of the Rangers
in Sindh himself supervised the exchanging of the kidnap victims. No arrests were made.
Sectarian organisations also have their patrons among the
intelligence agencies. Sources reveal that Sipah-e- Sahaba’s Riaz
Basra has been spotted in the company of a colonel who has also
given him shelter in his house.
Similarly, when three members of the Lashkar-i-Jhangvi
were picked up by the police, another colonel, who introduced
himself as their PRO, requested that they be released forthwith.
A senior official in a law-enforcement agency maintains
that the role of the intelligence agencies in terrorist killings
since 1988 can be gauged from the fact that such murders always
peak just prior to a change in government, contributing to the
destabilisation of the political climate, but they abruptly cease
once the new government is in place.
“A case in point was the October 10, 1999 attack on Masjid-i-Hur,
when nine worshippers were killed at dawn.
After the change of government two days later, I met with
a member of the ISI who said that such incidents will not take
place now. And sure enough, he was right.” Incidentally, there is a unit of the ISI and
MI in each district headquarter of the province to “assist” the
local administration.
The official quoted above has no hesitation
in accusing the ISI-S (Security) of orchestrating such murders
through the militants of sectarian parties, adding that Sipah-e-Sahaba
terrorists are trained by the agency. “The Sipah-e-Sahaba are
supported by the Haqiqi group.
The sectarian killings leading up to the Masjid-i-Hur massacre
had targeted non-Mohajirs, and even in this incident, the victims
were mainly Punjabis who comprise the majority of the residents
in that area. The SSP
activists are largely Punjabi or Sindhi, a fact that indicates
the involvement of the Haqiqi in the crime.”
Meanwhile, the MQM is said to be more aligned with the
Shia sectarian parties. This is corroborated by the fact that there
has been no sectarian strife in the areas of Karachi under the
MQM’s influence, which includes the portion of district Central
where the large Shia community of Rizvia Colony is located.
For many hardened criminals, joining a political party
offers several benefits. Not
only does it hold out the promise of shelter and protection in
the event of apprehension by the police, but it also gives them
access to a ready-made gang. Reveals a source, “They always share their crime money with the
party leaders in exchange for protection.”
A senior intelligence agency official discloses that of
all the militant groups operating in Karachi today, the MQM boasts
the most foolproof modus operandi for executing targeted hits.
“They manage to stump investigators because they cover
their tracks so well. One group is assigned to steal or snatch a
vehicle and park it at a designated spot.
Another is assigned the task of driving the vehicle to
another pre-determined spot.
Yet another is entrusted with the task of obtaining weapons
for the hit. Finally, there are the hit-men who carry out
the actual killing. All
these groups work independently of each other and are given as
much information as their particular task requires.
This way even if one group is apprehended, they cannot
divulge much information. As a matter of fact, the operatives involved
in such crimes are specifically told to provide the police with
all the information they have in order to spare themselves unnecessary
torture. Says a member of one of these groups, “Anyway,
we know that we can always retract our earlier statements made
in police custody by claiming they were made under coercion –
everyone is familiar with the methods of interrogation employed
by the police.”
Says a police official, “For hit-men, killing is routine
work; they simply accomplish the task assigned to them without
questioning the motive behind it.”
He cites the example of Hakim Saeed’s murder, where the
two MQM terrorists convicted of the crime were unable to provide
any information about its motive because they were genuinely unaware
of it.
According to the official, the breakaway factions of the
MQM, including the Haqiqi and the Goga groups, practice virtually
the same modus operandi as the Muttahida in carrying out assassinations.
Militants belonging to other parties have their own distinctive
styles of operation. Says one source, “The activists of a Sindh-based
militant organisation camouflage the numbers of the vehicles they
use with black markers.” These
distinctive modus operandi are often reliable clues as to the
identity of the perpetrators.
Members of terrorist gangs also speak in code while an
operation is underway. As a source reveals, “Ladoo banto (distribute sweets) is the signal to detonate
a bomb, tohfa (gift) means assassinate while mohalley ki safai
karo (clean the neighbourhood)
is an order to eliminate the opposition.”
Incidentally, says a police source, if apprehended, militants
from the interior of Sindh and Balochistan are usually the most
difficult to break even under severe torture.
“Since they have often led harsh lives, they have a very
high threshold of pain,” he maintains. A member of the underworld agrees with this
contention, citing the instance of an Iranian Baloch arrested
by the police in a major crime three years ago who, despite being
tortured the entire day, refused to divulge any information.
“In fact,” he says, “when the police re-entered the room,
they found that he had stitched both his lips shut.
He handed them a slip of paper on which was written, ‘If
you have the guts, try and make me confess now.’”
Some sources hold that while initially 90 per cent of crime
that occured in Karachi was carried out under party instructions,
it is now largely the domain of erstwhile activists of these parties,
most of whom have formed their individual gangs.
Mercenaries usually live from moment to moment, spending
lavishly on material comforts and bacchanalian parties flowing with wine
and featuring high-priced call girls, thus remaining dependent
on a life of crime. A
few of them successfully make the transition to a “respectable”
life, after investing in property and business from money made
through their criminal activities.
Also operating in the city are dozens of gangs unaffiliated
with any political organisation.
Involved in all kinds of crime ranging from vehicle theft
and house breaking to murder, they have 10 to 15 core members
and a fringe network of youngsters from 12 to 15 years of age
who work as lookouts for them.
Discloses a source, “They provide group leaders with details
about police activities in their areas and other required information
and are paid for their services on a daily or weekly basis.”
Gang members have been known to adopt colourful aliases
such as Cheeta, Cheel, Chingari, Langra, T.T., Shera, Toofan,
Commando, Kalashnikov, Sheedi and Boora among others.
Some of these gang members are illegal immigrants who,
according to the latest population census of 2000, number 30 lakh
in a total of 130 lakh residents of Karachi, the largest concentration
of aliens in the country. A random survey carried out in 1993 had estimated
there were 1,455,462 illegal immigrants in the city, an increase
of 184 per cent since 1989 when they numbered 511,835. Bengalis form the largest percentage, followed by Burmese and Afghans.
In certain localities of Karachi such as Machhar Colony,
one can even find signboards in Bengali. Reportedly, a Bengali newpaper is also brought
out in the city. While
many illegal immigrants engage in lawful occupations, such as
the fishing and garment industry or work as domestic servants,
there is estimated to be a sizeable number that are engaged in
criminal activities. The pattern of this criminal activity tends to be divided along
ethnic lines: Afghanis are involved in arms smuggling/dealing,
home-made explosives and drug trafficking, while Bengalis are
more active in house thefts, prostitution and the flesh trade.
According to a source, “The Federal Investigation Agency,
which is supposed to maintain a check on the entry of illegal
immigrants into Pakistan, allows them to slip into the country
because they are a source of income for the Agency. The job of the deputy director FIA at Pakistan’s
international airports is, in fact, considered the most lucrative
post.”
In any society, the main line of defence against crime
is the police. In Karachi and the rest of Sindh, the police, apart
from the MI and ISI units mentioned earlier, is also reinforced
by the Rangers, a large proportion of whose personnel are drawn
from the army. As the
Rangers’ actual task is to guard the country’s frontiers, they
are present in Sindh on deputation, and draw salaries almost twice
that of police personnel. “However,” says a senior official in a law
enforcing agency, “whenever it is proposed that they be sent back
to their original duties, the crime rate in the province mysteriously
goes up.”
Nevertheless, tales about the inefficiency of the police
force and the rampant corruption within its workings are legion.
Sources blame it largely on the budget of six billion rupees
allocated to Pakistan’s police, citing it as grossly inadequate.
At a recent seminar for police personnel, it was pointed
out that while the highly regarded London Metropolitan Police
has a budget of 1.5 billion pounds for a city with far less population
than that of Karachi, the entire police force in Pakistan, with
90,000 personnel, has about one-third that amount at its disposal.
Reveals a source, “Thanas (police stations) are totally
dependent on bhatta from hawkers, roadside florists, polish walas,
beggars etc. for their day to day running expenses – bhatta from
shops is usually demanded by political parties rather than the
police. Police stations in Karachi East, the largest district
in the city, comprising almost 45 per cent of Karachi’s total
area, probably make the most ‘beat money’ – maybe as much as 15
to 20 lakhs a month.”
In the official police budget, not even a single rupee
is allocated towards the investigation of crimes and facilities
that do exist for this purpose are primitive.
For example, currently available resources for the examination
of blood samples can only determine whether the sample is human
or animal. Investigating
officers are not even provided with basic items such as rubber
gloves or test tubes for proper collection of evidence.
In the absence of adequate resources or an effective criminal
justice system to counter terrorism, the police, often the target
of militant political activists’ wrath, began responding in kind.
When any of their personnel or police informers were murdered,
with their bodies stuffed into gunny bags and dumped by the roadside,
they meted out identical treatment to activists in their custody. At the height of the confrontation between the police and militants,
death in “police encounters” became the order of the day.
Meanwhile, the role played by the Citizens-Police Liaison
Committee (CPLC) in tackling certain types of crime in Karachi
cannot be under-estimated. The CPLC has been particularly successful
in controlling the incidence of kidnapping for ransom. Since 1990,
from a total of 245 such cases, it has solved 203 and apprehended
85 gangs of kidnappers while 42
of the cases remained unsolved. Says CPLC chief Jamil Yousuf,
“Kidnapping for ransom cases had peaked by 1990, but nothing was
being done about it. Then the army chief Asif Nawaz’s cousin’s two
children were kidnapped. Asif
Nawaz held a three-hour long meeting with me, after which military
intelligence 303 as well as 20 to 25 SSG commandos were assigned
to work in tandem with us. Within one week, on November 21, 1990, the
gang was busted, about 11 of the 20 members were arrested in the
first raid. The liaison
between the CPLC and MI under the corps commander began with this
case. We busted gangs of kidnappers every week after that.”
According to Jamil Yousuf, such gangs tend to split after
working together on two or three cases, usually falling out over
the division of the ransom money. “There have only been three cases in which
the kidnap victims died. The
Bhoja Air chairman’s son was one, but that was probably the result
of enmity. The way the kidnappers did it showed spite.
Kidnappers never kill anyone if they have abducted them
for money. There have
been four cases in which the victims returned home after 14 to
24 months.”
Over the years, the CPLC has acquired several technologically
advanced methods for solving kidnapping cases.
Voice matching is a technique they have had recourse to
for some time. “We give gangs code names according to their voices
and group them accordingly,” says Jamil Yousuf.
Apart from this, the CPLC now has the software that helps
determine how an individual may appear with or without certain
facial features such as a beard or how he may have aged over several
years. Their spatial crime
analysis system enables an overview of crime patterns to be charted
on a map of Karachi. Meanwhile,
their digitalised map of Karachi, marked with the location of
each street telephone booth in the city, is a vital tool in tracking
the movements of kidnappers and zeroing on their hideouts.
“We can’t track mobile phones but we can get the number
blocked so that kidnappers are compelled to resort to public telephones,”
discloses Jamil Yousuf. He strongly recommends that the purchase of a mobile phone line
must be made subject to the submission of the buyer’s photograph.
It seems that there are suggestions aplenty for the improvement
of the law and order situation in Karachi – from the deweaponisation
of Pakistani society and the creation of a national vehicle authority
to the registration of illegal aliens, an increase in the police
budget and the strengthening of the criminal justice system.
However, the implementation of these measures requires
a political will that no government has yet had the ability, or
courage, to demonstrate. 