|
Zaman,
a resident of a squatter settlement in Peshawar, did not bother
even to have a glimpse of his only daughter, Sara, born after four
sons. Neither did he decide on a name, as the very future of the
newborn girl seemed bleak, at least in the father's mind.
On Friday afternoon, when men were thronging the mosques
to offer prayers, Zaman entered the small courtyard of his house
where his wife was nursing her newborn child. Pulling the child
out of the mother's lap, Zaman barged out of the wooden door, expressionless,
without uttering a word.
Swiftly, he carried the huddled infant to a secluded area, away
from people. Squatting on the ground, he frantically placed the
newborn in his lap, while his huge coarse hands tried to get the
perfect grip of a fragile neck that was still warm and soft. Aggressively,
he squeezed the life out of his own daughter - a fragile, powerless
soul, who could neither plead for her life nor struggle against
the physical prowess of her father. Eventually, his strength triumphed
over the silent pleas of a nameless child.
On returning home, without any sign of remorse, he placed the limp
body back into the mother's arms, declaring, "I was too 'weak'
to protect her 'honour' for the rest of my life!"
The only sign of feeling expressed by him was when he ordered a
tombstone for her tiny grave, with the name 'Ayesha Bibi' etched
on it.
Zaman was powerful enough to take his four-day-old daughter's life,
but powerless in front of a giant named 'honour'. He snatched from
her the right to live, out of fear of not being able to live up
to the high expectations of honour set by his people and society.
'Honour' and ' killing' are contradictory terms, yet in a Pakhtun
society they go hand in hand, complementing one another. The merciless
killing of a girl in the name of 'honour' can actually make an individual
'honourable' in the eyes of society.
'Honour', according to rawaj (the set of rules practiced by Pakhtuns),
knows no boundaries, age or class. Being born a Pakhtun is enough
to enforce compliance with the rules and regulations stipulated
by Pakhtunwali, according to which honour is to be protected at
any cost. Numerous killings take place in the name of honour throughout
the rural areas, but most of them go unreported as an honour killing
is seen as a private concern.
Pakhtunwali, which is the code of conduct practiced by Pakhtuns,
is predominantly based on preserving honour and conforming to the
culture's behavioural expectations. Although men are considered
to be the custodians of honour, the burden of upholding it lies
on a woman's shoulders.
Practicing it could be so trying, that people prefer not to have
daughters - they are perceived as the embodiment of the honour of
their family that needs to be guarded and protected. The birth of
a boy is welcomed in most rural areas as a Pashtu proverb goes,
'Day haluk zairay khog eee dhroon eee kaanrey bootee pay khoshaala
ee ' (The news of a boy's birth is sweet and respectable, even stones
and trees rejoice upon hearing it).
Bus Bibi (stop lady), Balanishta or Naurina, which is sometimes
deliberately pronounced as 'Noray-na' (literally meaning, 'No more
girls'), are names sometimes given to Pakhtun girls by their families
to symbolically ward off the birth of yet another girl.
While the birth of a boy is marked with gunshots, the birth of a
daughter goes unmarked. No matter how tiny she is, she is perceived
as the family's sharam (honour) and purdah (shame) that needs to
be guarded against any outside threat.
At the birth of a girl the parents receive greetings like 'Khuday
day sharam parda o satee' (May God preserve your honour), 'Sar toray
mashay' (May you never lose your veil or purdah) and 'Naik bukhta
day shee' (May she grow up to be pious).
In the Mahmund tribe, two friends, Hashim and Sahibzada, made a
pledge that when their children were born, and if one of them was
a boy and the other a girl, they would be married to each other.
After having a son, Hashim went to inquire about the sex of Sahibzada's
newborn. Having second thoughts about the pledge, Sahibzada denied
the birth of his daughter, and said that he too had had a son. Suspecting
that his friend had gone back on his jabba (word), Hashim went to
the zaango (cradle) of the newborn to confirm Sahibzada's statement.
The moment he unwrapped the baby girl's suzni (swaddling cloth),
Sahibzada, considering it a shameful act, shot his friend, who,
however, managed to survive. Later, the jirga gave a verdict against
Hashim by stating that he had no right to touch or probe a female
infant, even if she was just a week old.
Right from her birth a girl can conveniently be used as an instrument
in building alliances or ending age-old animosities. As a child,
she might be betrothed by her father to someone as a part of a move
in family politics or as part of an exchange deal known as swarra.
As a child she enjoys freedom - but for a very brief span. Referred
to as someone's daughter, sister, wife or mother, she soon learns
the art of modesty and endurance. Muffled by the code of honour,
she is expected to be demure and retiring.
It is not easy to penetrate the high walls guarding the lives and
honour of a Pakhtun woman, who remains inaccessible and obscure,
living a culturally demanding life behind the four walls of her
home.
Outside the walls of her home - unless it is for gham (sorrow) or
khaadi (joy) occasions, or for her daily household chores such as
washing clothes at a nearby stream, collecting water etc. - she
has no status of her own. She is subject to someone else's authority
in order to gain acceptance.
Home, whether her father's or her husband's, is the place where
her honour rests. The more out of sight she is of strangers, the
more out of trouble she stays. As a Pashtu proverb says, 'Khazay
la , ya kor, ya gor' (For a woman, either home or grave).
In a tribal society, the criterion for survival does not depend
on a woman's biological fitness, but solely on her morality, which
truly assures her existence. A woman with a blemish-free character
is the one who can live her life fearlessly in a tribal society.
As an old proverb goes, Day khazay chay poza pa makh na ee, no pa
kando kay ba mordaree khoree. (One who does not have a 'nose' -
honour - will die of misery in desolate places).
A woman's honour is seen as a family or qom's (community's) honour,
and she must control her behaviour at all times, as it is judged
harshly by the community. The woman's honour is, in fact, linked
not just to her immediate family but to the whole clan or tribe.
Only culturally appropriate behaviour assures success in a society
where others are constantly interpreting one's actions. This self-awareness
and self-control continues throughout the life cycle of a woman.
Even a small blemish on one's code of honour can have an exaggerated
effect.
Ideally, a woman is expected to be ajuza (helpless/powerless) in
her behaviour. To quote a Pushtu proverb: Khaza kho ajuza daa (A
woman is helpless/powerless).
Tore is an offence in which a woman or a man are either proven or
are suspected of a sexual liaison or relationship, and even mere
suspicion can lead to tragic consequences. 'Honour' and Pakhtu are
seen as synonymous. Whoever fails to act according to the Pakhtun
code of conduct is seen as not worthy of being called a Pakhtun.
Tribal Pakhtuns accept no law but their own. According to the rawaj,
seeing a woman speak to, or hearing of her association with a stranger,
is enough to arouse a man's passion and saritob (manhood).
Whether the existence of a liaison can be proved beyond doubt or
not, the accused have to be killed in most cases.
Evidence of an illicit relationship or even flirtation is not required.
Perceived violation and disrespect of rawaj is enough to invite
dire consequences.
In a tribal agency, most disputes are decided in accordance with
rawaj (Pakhtun code of conduct). Although the civil administration
can, in certain cases, intervene directly with the use of force,
the role of the jirga (tribal assembly) remains undisputed.
In the case of 'moral' crimes, all matters are decided according
to the rawaj by a group of elders of strong lineage or the spingiray
(white-bearded), whose social status and experience entitles them
to an honourable place in the council.
The tribes of Bajaur have their own degrees of punishment in a tore
case. Some straight away kill the sinner, even for an unintentional
mistake, whereas some are ready to acquit the accused, provided
they atone in the form of a nanawatay (refuge/repentance), jora
(reconciliation), naik or bakhana (forgiveness).
In the Utmankhel tribe, if a woman is accused of tore, not only
she, but also all those who act as abettors are to be put to death.
The number of individuals shot dead in a single tore case, could
range upto six or seven individuals. For instance, if a woman elopes
with a man and later due to certain reasons marries someone else,
the second husband would also be considered an enemy.
Amongst the Mahmund tribe, despite serious consequences, tore cases
are on the rise, one of the reasons being the unaffordable amount
of sar paisa (bride price) which has gone up to 80,000 to 100,000
rupees, making it improbable for a lot of young men to find brides.
In the Mahmund tribe, not only the wrongdoer, but his entire family
have to leave their native land. Except for the accused persons,
the rest of the members of their families may return one by one
after paying a heavy fine. In Swat and Dir, swarra (the exchange
of women) and naik (monetary fine) are both accepted in tore cases.
A woman accused of tore can rarely get away with it. As Bizarjana
states, "Killing a girl is easy because she is like a kukra
chargha (a hen sitting on eggs)." According to a tribal tradition,
a woman accused of tore is to be shot by her father. Before being
shot, a woman kneels down and asks for forgiveness by uttering the
following words in a faltering voice, 'Zama day salaam wee' (a 'salaam'
cum apology). The father is expected to carry out the execution
in order to uphold his and his family's honour.
In case he shows any sign of hesitation or mercy, the woman's in-laws
put an end to her life, as their honour is at stake too. The funeral
is attended only by a handful of relatives, in order to deprive
the deceased of respect and funerary rites. Nobody goes for laas
niwa or condolence. In fact, the girl's father is congratulated
by everyone for having preserved his honour.
A girl who is accused of tore is deprived of mercy and forgiveness
till the very end. The whole process of killing her mercilessly,
sometimes publicly, is to set a precedent so that no one shows defiance
when it comes to acting according to the code of Pakhtunwali. Depriving
a woman of funerary rites is also symbolic. It is to show that even
death does not put an end to the suffering of tore. As a curse,
one can often hear people say, 'May you die a death of tore.'
Amongst some tribes
of Bajaur, reconciliation can take place if the tore issue concerns
an unmarried girl. However, any moral issue, minor or major, regarding
a married woman has to be dealt with sternly. If she is a matiza
(one who has eloped), the woman would be hounded the world over,
until her dead body is displayed, as proof that 'honour' was preserved.
Unless she escapes and abandons her village, a married woman can
rarely escape the fury of tore.
In Bajaur, if a malala (an unmarried girl) is teased by a stranger
and the incident becomes known publicly, no one will marry her.
There is a term, tekray agheestal, (snatching of veil) which men/boys
carry out as revenge in order to symbolically make a girl 'impure'
in the eyes of society. However, sharam or monetary compensation
is sometimes accepted in moral offences such as insulting a woman,
or not honouring the veil.
Although, the perpetrator after committing such offences might eventually
get away with his head held high by giving away a goat or some money
as compensation to the girl's parent, the girl continues to experience
social ostracism for a crime she had never committed.
Suspicion finds mercurial powers in tore. A woman must explain and
prove the source of all her belongings. Anything that has not been
given to her by her husband or her parents is suspect. She can be
killed over a mere handkerchief or some fruit whose source cannot
be satisfactorily explained. In order to emphasise the role played
by suspicion, a story is often narrated. Not every family can afford
a separate hujra (men's section) in their house. Once, a guest was
spending the night with a family in Barang Valley, in their single-room
house, enjoying the hospitality showered upon him. In the morning,
the host noticed a black louse creeping on the guest's neck. After
fabricating a story in his stirred-up mind, based on the groundless
supposition that a black louse could only belong to a woman, he
shot the guest and his wife.
In another incident, Naheeda Bibi of Kharkano was found guilty by
her husband, of being in possession of a packet of dry fruit, which
was suspected to be a gift from a paramour. Without hearing her
side of the story, the husband shot her dead on the basis of mere
suspicion. A famous Pushtu saying goes, Pa khaza, us, aao pa toora,
sa itebaar dae? (How can one rely on a woman, a horse and a sword?)
Despite a verse from the Holy Quran that says, 'Should any of your
women commit to some sexual offence, collect evidence about them
from four (persons) among yourselves,' women are butchered by the
husbands on the basis of suspicion alone and slaughtered over minor
breaches of etiquette, in the name of 'honour' and 'Pakhtunwali.'
A Pakhtun woman will always be judged from a Pakhtun perspective
that is based on age-old cultural notions.
In the urban areas, some murders of women who had shown defiance
to their cultural norms were conveniently camouflaged as 'provoked
murders,' thereby justifying these as killings that were 'deserved'
or 'asked for' by 'women who were not in control.'
Judges pass lighter sentences where murders of women have been rationalised
in this manner. Ironically, in most cases the murder is pre-planned
and not at all sudden. However, there is not only a kind of complacence
towards perpetrators of such crimes, they are, in fact, perceived
as victims who at that particular moment, were 'provoked' or forced
to resort to such an action.
Saz Mohammad Malik's daughter Shazmin, mother of six, was emotionally
traumatised by being reminded constantly by her husband of how much
he abhorred her, and that his precious youth was being wasted on
her. Weary of her presence in the house, he shot her dead during
a domestic quarrel. It is a popular belief that if one is innocent,
the face of the deceased glows - as did Shazmin, the villagers testify.
She is still remembered by them as a shaheeda (martyr). Her husband,
who later brought a nanawatay (apology) to her father's house, stated
that he shot her as he had become mad with rage during the quarrel.
His apology was accepted by Shazmin's father, as he had no other
choice, belonging to a weak family.
Gulnaz, from Bajaur, was residing with her in-laws, as her husband
was employed in Karachi. She wanted to visit her father's house,
but was denied permission by her brother-in-law. However, she continued
to plead her case. Enraged, the brother-in-law emptied the bullets
from his pistol into her frail body. The girl's father protested
against the atrocity but the jirga gave a verdict that in the absence
of her husband, the brother-in-law was the master of the house.
Thus, it was her primary duty to obey him. The murderer paid 3,000
rupees, a tin of cooking oil, a bag of wheat and a lamb as nanawatay
and was 'honourably acquitted.'
No matter how unbearable a woman's marital life is, the word divorce
remains taboo in the rural setting of the NWFP. A woman will repeatedly
be maltreated by her husband in front of her children, who, bearing
in mind the Quranic verse that, 'Paradise lies underneath the feet
of a mother,' watch in desperation the desecration of this venerated
creature of God. An option given by the Holy Quran is, 'If a woman
fears ill-treatment or desertion on the part of her husband, it
shall be no offence for them to seek a mutual agreement, for agreement
is best.' However, the sole choice granted by the rawaj is endurance.
Lifelong separation or even polygamy is seen as a practical substitute
for divorce.
Scared of pighore (taunt), the parents accept an abandoned daughter
with reluctance. In Bajaur, some women are left with no choice but
to take refuge with some of the influential families and offer their
services as marawaray (maid-servants, literally meaning 'unhappy')
for the rest of their lives.
Zarmin belonged to a village called Manoo Derai. Her husband would
mistreat her, but would not divorce her. Eventually, he claimed
that he could no more put up with a mentally ill wife and sent her
back to her father's house. Living with her parents, she used to
help with the household chores, which included fetching water from
a nearby spring. A post of a certain security force overlooked the
spring. The security guards of the post also used to fetch water
from the same spring, but at a different time of the day. Once,
Zarmin disappeared for almost 24 hours. Stories started circulating,
linking Zarmin with the incharge of the security post. Finally,
when Zarmin did come home she did not say a single word in reply
to all the questioning that took place. The men of the family, asked
the authorities to hand over the security guard to them. The guard
was soon transferred to South Waziristan agency. However, Zarmin
could not escape the fate in store for women in similar situations.
Villagers will tell anyone who might ask that a naked electric cable
was wound around her body and she was given electric current shocks
for half an hour. She pleaded with her brother to put an end to
her agony, which he finally did. She was shot for a 'sin,' which
till today no one knows for sure whether she had committed or not.
Since divorce is not common in the tribal areas, on numerous occasions
a clever stratagem is employed. A man would simply shoot his wife
dead and announce that she had a liaison with a certain person,
who, in actuality, had to be eliminated. Since no proof is demanded
in such cases and mere allegation suffices, the enemy or rival falls
unawares into a trap.
For a girl or woman to choose a marriage partner for herself is
not only seen as undesirable but also as an act that brings shame
to the family. It is common for the male relatives to bring charges
against daughters who have married or are intending to marry a partner
of their choice.
Most of the women lingering in the jails of NWFP have been convicted
because their family or parents have brought criminal charges of
zina against them.
Samia Sarwar, daughter of Sarwar Mohmand, a prominent industrialist
of NWFP, was killed in the name of honour at her lawyer's office
in Lahore. Samia's family felt their honour was being threatened
by her disobedience in seeking divorce from an abusive husband.
The blatant murder of Samia passed by like a swift wind, leaving
the perpetrators untouched and guiltless of a grisly crime. A precedent
had been set by the state, judiciary and civil society that 'honour
killings,' would continue to remain above the law, human rights
and religion.
In the dingy barracks of Peshawar jail sat Noreen, still unaccustomed
to the hostile environment around her. Her parents filed an F.I.R
against her under the Zina Ordinance as she had refused to marry
the partner her family had chosen for her. She had expressed her
desire to marry someone else instead.
Her disobedience has not only landed her behind bars but also shattered
her trust in her own family members whom she always looked up to.
She knows that if she steps out of jail, they would kill her for
the defiance she has shown. To her, the soiled bars of the prison
symbolise life whereas freedom for her could actually mean death.
The deputy superintendent further confirms, "Many girls/women
convicted of zina, are killed by their own family members, once
they leave the jail premises."
Another girl, Shahida, from Matanee, refuses to step out of jail
with her brothers because she knows that beyond the large iron doors
of prison, the only thing that awaits her is death. Her husband,
who mistreated her, refused to divorce her. She developed a liking
for an Afghan boy. Once, while talking to him outside the door of
her house, she saw her brothers and other male members of the family
heading towards her with guns in their hands. She was forced to
run away with the Afghan boy out of fear.
She and the Afghan boy have ended up in jail. However, the penalty
does not end here. The brothers are trying their level best to secure
her release, so that they can take her back and kill her in order
to regain their lost honour.
The stigma associated with such crimes is, by itself, a heavy penalty.
Most of the women prisoners, not having any legal awareness, are
unable to provide surety. Mostly, girls/women who have been imprisoned
at the instigation of their own family have no other choice but
to ask the complainants for surety. Therefore, even if they are
freed, and the family decides to spare them, they would continue
to live a life of misery and social ostracisation.
The community or society at large act as partners in crime by standing
by as spectators, and not protesting the fact that someone is setting
a precedent that would encourage other potential 'criminals of Pakhtunwali.'
|