Those
were testing times. Post-Kargil, post Nawaz Sharif's
ouster by a military regime. Clinton, then president
of the US, 'transited' in Pakistan on his way back home
from India, for precisely five hours, in which he lectured
Pakistanis directly on the virtues of democracy in a
nationally televised address (so much for sovereignty).
These
are 'better' days, comparitively speaking. Post-September
11, post Pakistan's co-option as a frontline ally in
the US war on terror, and our "sterling" performance
in delivering terrorists at Washington D.C.'s doorstep.
So when US President George W. Bush stopped in Islamabad
for a full 24 hours, after a trip to India in which
several 'sweet' deals were signed, including one on
providing nuclear technology for civilian purposes -
never mind India's refusal to sign the NPT - one expected
Pakistan to get at least a small slice of the cake.
But
other than lauding Mush for appointing his daughter
as lady-in-waiting to Mrs Laura Bush during her stay
in Isloo, playing cricket in the US Embassy backyard,
and lecturing his 'buddy' on the virtues of democracy
and free and fair elections, the US President had nothing
to offer. Not even F-16s. What's more, the much touted
Bilateral Investment Treaty, which was expected to provide
Pakistani exporters greater access to US markets --
a facility granted to countries like Nepal, Bangladesh,
Jordan and Kenya - was not signed.
Agitated
Pakistanis are demanding to know exactly what Mr Bush
delivered to its staunchest ally in tangible terms (other
than baseballs and sermons). A perfectly fair question,
given our propensity to deliver at the drop of a hat.
Why we even delivered 48 heads, on a silver platter
in Waziristan, a day prior to Bush's arrival. The "collateral
damage" that Pakistan has suffered as a consequence
of its desire to be in the US loop is colossal, and
continues to mount. But no one in the corridors of power
is counting.
The US, meanwhile, is fashioning a new world order
in which India, the fastest emerging economic power,
is destined to play a major role, both as a market for
US goods and as a bulwark against China. In this swiftly
changing scenario, shouldn't Pakistan be weighing its
own options, rather than looking to Capitol Hill for
a few crumbs occasionally thrown its way?
Our
relationship with the US has always been one of convenience
- the US's convenience. And let there be no illusions
on that score. They have dictated the rules of engagement,
and we have followed obsequiously, with total disregard
for our national interests . Maybe it's finally time
we stopped "beating around the Bush" and focused
our energies on putting our own house in order to stake
a claim as a sovereign and responsible entity in the
comity of nations.