|
We
now know why the windscreen of the car of the First Secretary in
the Pakistan High Commission, "a lady diplomat who was a very
friendly person," was smashed to bits when it was parked at
a New Delhi hotel a few years ago. As G. Parthasarathy, a former
Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan, tells it, the purpose was
to convey a message. According to Parthasarathy, ISI agents had
forcibly abducted one of his officials in Islamabad "in the
presence of his screaming wife and his protesting Pakistani neighbours."
He was released "only after he was severely beaten and bruised."
So
India came up with a tit-for-tat response. The lady diplomat from
Pakistan, posted in New Delhi, was chosen as a target and it seemed
to be relevant that she was "genuinely interested in Indian
art and culture." Parthasarathy adds: "The message got
home
and at least while I was High Commissioner in Islamabad,
my staff breathed freely, confident that the ISI would think twice
before manhandling them."
There
is certainly a lot more about how India and Pakistan have traded
messages in a relationship that defies any rational, or diplomatic
behaviour. Diplomatic Divide is the inaugural volume in an imaginative
series on relations between the two countries under the banner of
cross-border talks. The format allows prominent Indians and Pakistanis
to discuss the issues that divide them within the covers of one
book. Here, two senior retired diplomats, who have served as High
Commissioners in each other's countries, debate the issues that
divide India and Pakistan in the context of their personal experiences
and impressions. As the series editor, David Page, underlines in
his introduction, this dialogue is very crucial "if the two
countries are to put the spectre of nuclear war behind them and
to ensure a more secure and prosperous future for their citizens."
Unfortunately, this volume has appeared at a time when events
have dated its otherwise very interesting and insightful content.
David Page's introduction is dated January 2004 and the two write-ups
were evidently drafted well before the dramatic launch of the peace
process. For instance, Dr Humayun Khan, stressing the futility of
the two countries living in a state of perpetual hostility, writes:
"For more than a year, they have not even been talking to each
other. This is a sad reflection on the wisdom of their leaders."
On his part, Parthasarathy offers a thought that must have been
prompted by circumstances prevalent at the time he was writing his
account: "While we adjusted soon to the new situation, Pakistan
sadly lacked the leadership or people with vision to recognise that
the days of its presumed indispensability to the western world were
over." Was this written even before 9/11?
However, this book retains its value in a given historical
perspective. It holds the readers' attention because both authors,
who share equal space of more than 60 pages each, have recounted
their observations in an anecdotal style. Dr Khan was High Commissioner
to India from 1984 to 1988, in the Zia period. Parathasarathy was
to Pakistan from 1998 to 2000 but his impressions about Pakistan
were formed in the eighties when he was India's Consul General in
Karachi. In that sense, Parthasarathy's encounters with Pakistani
society were more varied and he uses, at times, his diplomatic finesse
to recount his exploits in our social world. Dr Khan has drawn entirely
on his memory and the time he writes about is more distant. Appropriately,
his chapter is titled: 'Reflections of an Ambassador.'
Parthasarathy
presents more human interactions in his 'Memories of Pakistan.'
Relatively, Parthasarathy appears to be more skilful and self-assured
while presenting India's case. Dr Khan, inspite of his obvious erudition,
seems not to have been so rooted in his country's foreign policy
establishment.
At various levels, the two diplomats portray the great excitement
that made their assignments so different from any other posting
and there are some engaging vignettes of the period they are writing
about. At one official reception in the early years of Rajiv Gandhi's
premiership, Dr Khan writes, "Rajiv Gandhi left the receiving
line to specially come and congratulate us because he had just received
the news that Pakistan had beaten India at cricket in Sharjah with
Javed Miandad hitting a six off the last ball of the match."
When a group led by Makhdoom Sajjad Hussain Qureshi, governor of
our Punjab, visited New Delhi, Qureshi had a hilarious session with
Giani Zail Singh, the Indian President. "They both spoke in
Punjabi, the language common to them. The conversation included
a number of witty asides about a shy young man accompanying the
governor whose name was Nawaz Sharif and who had obviously come
along for fun."
There is a lot of serious stuff about such matters as Kashmir, the
Simla Accord, the events in Indian Punjab and the hijacking of the
Indian Airlines plane in December 1999. Incidentally, Parthasarathy
does not approve of the handling of the hijacking by the Indian
government. He writes: "According to those who travelled on
the aircraft in which Jaswant Singh travelled to Kandahar along
with the three released terrorists, Maulana Masood Azhar spent his
time on the flight to Kandahar hurling abuses at Jaswant Singh and
India. No incident has symbolised the surrender and the abdication
of authority of the Indian state since the release of terrorists
during the Rubaiyya Sayeed kidnapping more than the manner in which
we bowed to terrorist demands during the Kandahar hijacking."
Though there are many other glimpses of a similar nature
that may be quoted, the idea is merely to suggest the readability
of the two accounts. Yes, we cannot ignore the disharmony that these
accounts have with the present phase in our bilateral relations.
But we cannot ignore the past either, particularly when it has a
habit of constantly repeating itself.
|