|
After
months of bloody confrontation and the loss of more than 120 lives,
the Pakistan army and pro-Taliban Islamic militants in South Waziristan
finally made peace with each other in late April. The unwritten
agreement which silenced the guns and restored peace in the Wana
valley is still holding, but the contentious issue of the non-Pakistanis
allegedly hiding in the area could cause it to snap.
The
army commanders and the militants resisted the temptation to declare
victory after concluding the agreement. Rather, both took pains
to describe it as a reconciliation between estranged brothers. However,
partisans of both parties lost no time in proclaiming victory for
their respective sides and launching a diatribe against each other.
The MMA leaders, who backed the militants and were critical of the
military operation in South Waziristan, contended that those on
the army's wanted list meant no harm to Pakistan and it would be
wiser to befriend them rather than turning them into outlaws. Federal
Information Minister, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, and Interior Minister,
Faisal Saleh Hayat, who played no role in forging the peace agreement,
claimed that the government had achieved all its objectives by forcing
the five most wanted tribal militants to surrender and flushing
out the so-called "foreign terrorists" from their stronghold
in the Azam Warsak area near Wana. Predictably, their claims provoked
the militants and one of them, Maulana Mohammad Abbas, issued a
statement to remind the ministers to check their facts with the
military authorities before "opening their mouths."
The
tit for tat notwithstanding, most tribespeople in the seven Federally
Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), including South Waziristan, and
the several frontier regions of the NWFP welcomed the reconciliation.
The fighting around Wana had spread to other parts of South Waziristan
and military convoys and installations had been attacked in North
Waziristan and the Kurram tribal agency as well. Peshawar too was
attacked with rockets, apparently fired from the nearby Khyber agency.
It was the first time that the city, which had suffered frequent
bomb explosions while serving as the headquarters of the Afghan
"jihad" during the 1980s and early 1990s, was rocketed.
The fallout of the Wana conflict was increasingly being felt beyond
FATA.
Supporters
of the MMA and PML-N, the most vocal and bitter critics of the Wana
military operation, also felt relieved when the soldiers and the
militants publicly embraced each other at Shakai, a remote, mountainous
village in South Waziristan. The thought that Muslims and Pakistanis
were killing each other had made them sad and angry. In their view,
the military action was being dictated by the US and was endangering
the unity of the country.
The
PPP, ANP and other secular and nationalist parties also criticised
the Wana military operation but, unlike the MMA, their sympathies
didn't lie with the militants. Rather, one of the major objectives
of these parties while criticising the military action in Wana was
to condemn the President, General Pervez Musharraf, and Mir Zafarullah
Khan Jamali's government. As usual, the political parties based
their reaction to the Wana operation on their respective political
stances towards President Musharraf. There was no inclination or
effort to objectively analyse the Wana situation and respond to
it in a manner that served the much-abused national interest.
Far more important for the government was the international,
or rather the US reaction to the Shakai agreement. After a cautious
response by the US military spokesman in Afghanistan, Lt Colonel
Matt Beevers, in which he welcomed the political process as a means
to an end in tackling the problem of Al-Qaeda and Taliban suspects
in South Waziristan, his boss, General David Barno, came up with
a tough statement expressing concern over the amnesty offered by
the Pakistan government to the foreign militants reportedly hiding
in the area. He said the US expected action by the Pakistan army
against the Al-Qaeda and Taliban suspects. Coming on the heels of
aggressive statements by Zalmay Khalilzad, the US ambassador to
Afghanistan, in which he questioned Pakistan's commitment to hunt
down Taliban fighters operating from Pakistan's border areas, it
was obvious that Washington was exerting pressure on Islamabad to
do more in America's war on terror.
However,
one had to weigh this tough public posture by Washington's men on
the spot in Afghanistan by comparing it with the frequent praise
that top US government functionaries, ranging from President George
W. Bush to Foreign Secretary Colin Powell and from Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld to Deputy Foreign Secretary Richard Armitage, shower
on Pakistan and President Musharraf on account of his contribution
to the war on terror. No doubt that it is a calculated policy aimed
at keeping Pakistan in good humour as well as under constant pressure.
Moreover, one is aware that a few days before his outburst against
Pakistan, General Barno rang up Corps Commander Peshawar, Lt. Gen.
Safdar Hussain, to congratulate and thank him for formulating a
policy that would isolate Al-Qaeda by draining it of its local support
in South Waziristan. In fact, the US general reportedly told his
Pakistani counterpart that there had been no cross-border raid by
Pakistan-based militants in Afghanistan for more than three weeks
after the army operation and the initiation of the reconciliation
process in South Waziristan.
Lt.
Gen. Safdar Hussain, who served in the ISI's analysis wing before
his promotion and appointment as Corps Commander Peshawar, is very
optimistic about the success of his political-military strategy
in regard to dealing with homegrown Islamic militants and their
foreign guests in South Waziristan. He had barely taken over when
the government asked him to send his troops to South Waziristan
to deal with the militants after they had routed and killed 15 militiamen
from the paramilitary Frontier Corps in an ambush near Azam Warsak.
As
he kept losing soldiers in combat with the battle-hardened tribal
militants and the collateral damage caused by the military operation
increasingly engendered the ire of the tribesmen against the army,
the Corps Commander reflected on how he could win the trust of the
tribespeople. He realised pushing a development agenda - i.e. bringing
schools, clinics, roads, electricity and enlightenment to the under-developed
and conservative tribal areas such as South Waziristan - would be
a vital step in that direction. Furthermore, it would deny the militants
favourable conditions for their sustenance.
The militants recognised that real power in the country was
wielded only by the Pakistan army and it could be expected to deliver
on its promises. Besides, they trusted no one else. The corps commander
also realised the compulsions of the militants, who wanted a face-saving
agreement after having declared "jihad" against the Musharraf
government.
The amnesty offered to Nek Mohammad and the remaining most-wanted
tribesmen - Sharif Khan, Noor Islam, Maulana Mohammad Abbas and
Maulana Abdul Aziz - was aimed at weaning them away from the non-Pakistanis
allegedly linked with Al-Qaeda and Taliban. Two pro-MMA MNAs from
South Waziristan, Maulana Merajuddin Qureshi and Maulana Abdul Malik
Wazir, were requested to serve as mediators because they shared
a pro-Taliban ideology with the tribal militants. The militants
until then had refused to strike a deal through the many tribal
jirgas that had attempted to make them surrender to the military
authorities in return for amnesty. Aware of the sensitivities of
Nek Mohammad and his tribal militants, the corps commander agreed
not to refer to the Shakai jirga as "surrender" and instead
described it as "reconciliation." Also, the militants
did not lay down arms. Rather, they presented an array of gifts,
including an old sword, Waziristani daggers, prayer mats, "maswak"
(wooden tooth brush) and "tasbeeh" (prayer beads) to the
corps commander and other civil and military officers who accompanied
him to Shakai.
There is no doubt that the 27-year-old Nek Mohammad emerged
as a hero in the wake of the Shakai agreement. The young man, with
his flowing hair and beard and piercing eyes, earned nation-wide
recognition when he recited an Urdu couplet before making a spirited
speech at Shakai to the applause of his armed men. His supporters
credit him with putting up a tough fight against the Pakistan army
and then forcing it to strike a deal with him on his terms. Though
he promised not to fight the army or harbour foreigners again in
return for amnesty, he managed simultaneously to prevail upon the
government to release the 163 local tribesmen and Afghan refugees
arrested by the military during the Wana operation in March, compensate
all those tribesmen whose homes were demolished or damaged in the
fighting and provide more money for development work in South Waziristan.
More importantly, he and his men are maintaining that they made
no promise to deliver the wanted non-Pakistanis to the government.
This indeed could threaten the vague agreement that was concluded
at Shakai. The army want help from Nek Mohammad and his supporters
to convince the foreigners to register and seek amnesty in return
for a promise not to use Pakistan's territory for attacks against
any other country, including Afghanistan and the US. Military officials
believe they would be able to neutralise the foreigners through
their offer of amnesty as they have done in case of the tribal militants
such as Nek Mohammad.
One
will have to wait and see whether the military's optimism is realistic
or misplaced. Following the hoped-for neutralisation of Pakistani
tribal militants, the registration of the foreigners and their numbers
and level of importance would be the second yardstick to measure
the success of the army's political-military strategy in South Waziristan
and the rest of the tribal areas.
|