|
Lately,
Washington's policy-makers have turned an attentive ear to Islamabad's
recently-expressed concerns that US statements on the future of
democracy in Pakistan are playing to the opposition's gallery, creating
additional domestic tensions for General Musharraf, which he can
most certainly do without.
Taking
these concerns seriously, American officials have now hugely diluted
their position on the so-called democracy benchmarks for Pakistan.
They have taken to using the kind of fluff on the subject that does
not grate on Islamabad's taut nerves.
Consider
the following sample from an interview Richard A Boucher, Assistant
Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs, gave last month to
a local channel. The point under discussion was General's Mushararf's
uniform:
"Again,
another particular piece of the big picture. What's important is
to see the progress, to see the movement towards democratic leadership,
civilian leadership for Pakistan. But exactly how the uniform issue
is addressed, I'll leave that to Pakistanis
President Musharraf
has said it is (an internal matter). It's an internal matter but
it's also an issue that we recognise is important. But it's also
one that we think President Musharraf is trying to address."
This
is pure fudge, grammatically bland, and cooked to soothe Islamabad's
anxiety on the uniform issue.
And that's not all. A friendly Washington is doing more:
US officials seem to have, at least publicly, settled for "procedural
authenticity" of democracy in Pakistan. 'As long as rules are
adhered to and procedures are transparent, all is well' is Washington's
new threshold of tolerance for the present system.
There
is a studied silence on General Musharraf's steps towards restoration
of democracy or simply appreciation of the distance he claims Pakistan
has travelled towards a genuine participatory system.
The US believes that the election commissioner "is committed
to playing a very key role of ensuring that elections are free and
fair under the Pakistani constitution." It also endorses that
there is an "an independent Election Commission."
In
order of priority, the US has carefully marked the signposts on
the road to democracy "as part of the overall development of
Pakistani society to achieve a more stable society, a more open
society, a more democratic society, a more prosperous society."
Washington
has also started to mix its rhetoric about the need for "free
and fair elections in 2007" with long reiterations of the virtues
of the present set-up.
Here
is Mr. Boucher, wielding the trowel of trite phrases, again laying
it on thick. The subject was the upcoming elections: "You know,
we're a long way from that election, in some ways. We're getting
closer all the time. We've been talking for a long time about the
direction that Pakistani society has taken, the sort of moderate
direction, the more open direction. We have attributes here that
some other countries don't have - we have a free press, we have
some degree of government accountability. We have seen local elections.
We have very active political parties. So there are a lot of things
that are headed in the right direction here. And it's a direction
that we support."
President Bush's damp-squib visit, too, deliberately avoided meetings
with the opposition leaders in Pakistan - a post he touched in India.
Insiders say that this was a sure signal to his friend in Pakistan
that his domestic sensitivities are being factored in as Washington
weighs its future options in Pakistan.
The
opposition parties view this as a setback to the attempt to wrest
power back from the General. They had started to pin their hopes
on "moral backing" from Washington in their quest for
"complete civilian supremacy." Clearly, they under-estimated
the strength of the bond that exists between Bush and Mush.
|