|
Despite
the government's insistence that the privatisation of the Pakistan
Steel Mills (PSM) has been entirely transparent, economic experts,
opposition parties and the plant's employees are skeptical about
the sale of this strategically important unit, for what they contend
is a paltry sum. Critics maintain that the government has sold the
main plant and the valuable land it is situated on at a throwaway
price.
On
March 31, 2006, the Privatisation Commission (PC) announced it had
sold 75 per cent shares of the PSM, considered the key industrial
unit of the public sector, for 21.680 billion rupees - ie. 362 million
USD. The cost per share was calculated at 16.80 rupees.
The
PC declared that the successful consortium, comprising Arif Habib
Securities (Pakistan), Al-Tuwairqi (Saudi Arabia) and Magnitogorsk
Iron & Steel Works Open JSC (Russia) had made the highest bid
at an open bidding ceremony held in Islamabad under the chairmanship
of then Privatisation Minister, Awais Ahmed Khan Leghari.
The
fact that the government seemed to be in a hurry to dispose off
its units can be gauged from the fact that on the same day as the
bidding ceremony, the Privatisation Commission issued a Letter of
Acceptance (LOA) to the consortium. Under this letter, the consortium
had to deposit 25 per cent of its bid in 20 days and complete full
payment in 60 days. The PC disclosed that so far it has received
5.420 billion rupees, in accordance with the stipulated schedule.
The
runner-up among the bidders was also a consortium, comprising Noor
Financial (Kuwait), Industrial Union of Donbass (Ukraine), Government
of Ras Al Khaimah and Al-Jomaih Holdings (Saudi Arabia). Its final
offer was 21.6 billion rupees (USD 355 million), at a rate of 16.50
rupees per share.
The critics' main objection to the sale is the inclusion
of the valuable land in the deal. They contend that the actual price
of the land in the Steel Mills' area is more than 20 million rupees
per acre and, at that rate, the government could have earned 90
to 92 billion rupees from the land alone. Furthermore, they contend,
even the cost of just the plant itself is higher than the price
the whole package fetched.
The
government claims that it has privatised only 4,547 acres of land
on which the actual plant is located. Officials maintain that the
PSM held a total of 19,000 acres of land and about 14,500 acres,
with an estimated value of 800 million USD, have been separated
from the transaction. The PC contends that this land will now be
used by the government for appropriate projects.
Meanwhile, the Sindh government is contending that it has a claim
on the PSM land as per the legal framework governing it. The Sindh
government's stance is that the land had been allotted to the federal
government in the 1970s for the establishment of the Pakistan Steel
Mills, but since the PSM no longer belongs to the federal government,
the land should be given back to the province. The Sindh government's
plea, however, has been ignored in the corridors of power in Islamabad
and the federal government is reportedly planning to hand over the
land to the National Industrial Parks Development and Management
Company (NIPDMC), which has been assigned the task of setting up
new industrial parks across the country.
The
government's privatisation programme had already been under fire
before the PSM deal, particularly after the sale of the Pakistan
Telecommunications Company Limited (PTCL) and the Karachi Electric
Supply Corporation (KESC).
In
the case of the KESC, the highest bidder had failed to pay the required
amount on time, so the government had to negotiate with the second
highest bidder.
As
for the privatisation of PTCL, the government faced major embarrassment
when the main bidder, Etisalat, initially backed out of the deal.
Subsequently, after renegotiating, the government accepted the UAE
company's terms and later handed over the company's management to
it.
The privatisation of the Pakistan Steel Mills has dealt the credibility
of the government's privatisation programme a final blow as there
is a wide-ranging belief that the deal could have fetched much more
than the sale price. "The plant could have fetched more money
even if it was sold as scrap," said Haq Nawaz Akhtar, a former
Chairman of the Pakistan Steel Mills. "It is a pity that other
countries are setting up new steel plants in the public sector and
in Pakistan, profitable and running units are being sold at throwaway
prices," he added.
Akhtar,
who was head of the PSM between 1981 and 1986, contended that the
government should not have privatised the PSM at any cost. According
to him there was certainly no compelling reason to privatise the
mill which had, in fact, signed a deal with a Russian company to
double its production within two years.
Most affected by this deal are the mill employees. Thousands of
PSM workers are worried about their future in the new set-up and
fear widespread retrenchment. Although the government claims that
it has offered an attractive package to the employees, representatives
say they are not satisfied with the offer. "The government
assurances have no credibility, because it has not protected the
rights of workers of any of the other privatised units," said
Abdul Sattar Butt, General Secretary of the Pakistan Steel Employees
Action Committee. For example, he said, after the privatisation
of Habib Bank, PTCL and Naya Daur Motors, the new managements terminated
the services of many workers, despite agreements and assurances
to the contrary.
The Employees Management Group (EMG), one of the bidders for the
PSM, could not muster the funds required to even reach the final
stage of the process. Sattar Butt disclosed that the reference price
was too high for the EMG which was why they decided to sideline
themselves. Although the reference price has never been officially
disclosed at any stage, unofficial sources maintained that the pre-bidding
reference price of the PSM was an estimated 75 billion rupees. However,
the government claims that the bidding price matched the reference
price.
The PSM, with a designed production capacity of 1.1 million tonnes,
was incorporated as a private limited company in 1968 with technical
assistance from the then USSR and commenced full-scale commercial
operations in 1984. The Pakistan Steel Mills complex includes coke
oven batteries, a sintering plant, blast furnaces, steel converters,
bloom and slab casters, billet mill, hot and cold rolling mills,
a galvanising unit and its own power generation unit of 165 MW,
supported by various ancillary units. Located about 40 km south-east
of the financial capital of Pakistan, Karachi, and in close proximity
to Port Bin Qasim, the mills have access to a dedicated jetty, which
facilitates the import of raw materials.
Besides the main plant, the privatisation transaction also includes
the sale of other assets like the steel ore plant in Thatta district,
a 110 MGD water reservoir plant, a thermal power plant, an oxygen
plant, a 72 kilometre railway track and 14 800 horse-power locomotive
engines in running condition with over 100 railway wagons. According
to Butt, if the value of those assets is calculated, the total cost
reaches more than 200 billion rupees.
He disclosed that the PSM's thermal power plant, after fulfilling
the requirements of the steel plant and residential areas of Steel
Town and Gulshan-e-Hadeed Phase-I, is selling electricity to the
KESC. The oxygen plant meanwhile, provides oxygen to various industries
and hospitals.
Apart from the costly prime land, Butt maintained that the mill's
present inventory of raw material in store stands at around seven
billion rupees and an inventory of finished steel products, of almost
equal value, is also lying at the plant, which will all be transferred
to the new management. According to him, the mill's sale of product
currently amounts to 3.5 billion rupees per month.
"The total assets of the mills are valued at more than 150
billion rupees and the government has sold the entire plant, along
with the precious land, for only 21.7 billion rupees to its favourite
parties," maintained Butt."We have now asked the government
to sell the unit to us at 25 billion rupees," said Butt, adding
that the employees have managed to rustle up 17-18 billion rupees
on account of gratuity and provident fund. However, the government
is not ready to accept any such offer. A spokesman for the Privatisation
Commission said that now, when the privatisation process for the
PSM has been successfully completed, certain individuals with "vested
interests" were suggesting new and out-of-process offers which
could not be considered either justifiable or appropriate by any
economic writer, analyst or critic.
Arif Habib, head of Arif Habib Securities, said that their consortium
would invest 60 million rupees in the PSM within a short period
of time to increase the existing production capacity of 1.1 million
tonnes to 1.5 million tones. He said running such a huge industrial
unit with only 1.1 million tonnes production was not feasible, so
the consortium has to increase the plant's production.
However, some senior economists and people associated with the steel
business contend that apart from the controversy regarding the privatisation
itself, there is a concern about its probable fallout: an increase
in the prices of steel products, particularly the material used
in construction. "The privatisation of the Steel Mills is the
transformation of a public monopoly into a private monopoly, providing
no benefit to the common man," said Dr. Asad Saeed, a senior
economist and Director, Collective for Social Science Research.
There is further anxiety among steel traders because the PSM has
been handed over to the same Saudi group which plans to set up a
private sector steel manufacturing unit near the Steel Mills. President
General Pervez Musharraf, in fact, performed the ground-breaking
ceremony of the 130 million USD Tuwairqi Steel Mills (TSM) in the
Port Qasim area just a day before the bidding for the PSM.
All the criticism and concern notwithstanding, the privatisation
deal has been finalised, and the new management is all set to take
over the mills. Another blatant example say critics, of how the
family silver is being disposed off, without even the family's by-your-leave.
|