|
Q: Do you think that the current dialogue between India and Pakistan
will prove to be fruitful?
A: This dialogue reflects the ground realities of both countries.
For the past 56 years people of both countries have constantly suffered
due to increased confrontations. Various efforts have been made
[to improve the situation], for example, during Nawaz Sharif's time,
and then there was Atal Bihari Vajpayee's bus trip. Then Kargil
happened, followed by the Agra summit during Musharraf's government.
I think the leadership on both sides has exhausted all options and
has realised the need to establish an atmosphere of friendship,
which people on both sides wish to encourage. I am supportive of
this process.
Q: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has stated that India recognises
Kashmir as an issue that needs to be addressed along with other
issues. Are you satisfied with that statement?
A: You will be surprised to learn that in 2002, when
our party did not win a majority, we sat with Congress and drafted
the common minimum programme. The first sentence of the programme
was that the government of India would initiate an unconditional
dialogue with the people of Jammu and Kashmir. I think Congress
is committed to resolving this issue. I am optimistic that it will
go forward because there is no question of turning back. I'm not
saying that a single round of discussions will resolve the issue.
It is going to be a time-consuming process.
Q: Doesn't Manmohan Singh's statement implicitly acknowledge
that the state you are chief minister of is disputed territory?
A: That is not the case. I don't see it like that.
This government's mandate is to find a solution for this problem,
which can only come through dialogue [between the two countries].
There is no other way. We are trying to tell our people that violence
is not the solution and to give peace a chance. The people of India
want the militancy to be dealt with. I have met the Prime Minister
of India and he is very keen on finding a solution.
Q: There is an overriding concern in Srinagar and other
areas about the rising instances of custodial killings. Your government
had promised 'dialogue, jobs for every resident, and a healing touch
for all.' What happened to the healing touch?
A: These allegations are not true. The people of Srinagar
live with a sense of security. If you interact with people, you
will see that nobody is afraid or worried. Earlier, no one dared
to leave their house after 7:00 p.m. However, now we have posted
security forces and are holding the army accountable for security
mishaps. Everything has become functional. The education system
is flourishing, tourism has risen, developmental activities are
in the process. While there may be exceptions, the number of custodial
killings is exaggerated.
Q: There is reliable information to suggest that thousands
have died
A: No, not thousands. These are exaggerated numbers.
Casualties can be counted on the fingertips. There have been about
27 custodial killings during our period, and wherever they occur,
we take action.
Q: You speak of a sense of security having returned, yet
we see troops all over the city. It is like one large barrack
A: No not at all. In Srinagar there are just paramilitary
forces, not army troops. This is misinformation. Human rights violations
are at their lowest here and we have made army and security forces
accountable for any violence between civilians and armed forces.
Whenever there is excessive violence, people come out on the roads
to protest. I'll give you statistics: in our period [of governance]
there have been only 27 or 28 cases of custodial killings.
Q:
The European Union's Foreign Relations Committee report states that
1,000 custodial deaths have occurred in the last year, half of which
were at the hands of security forces.
A: You know mishaps can take place. Many are happening
in your country as well. Aren't you dealing with an insurgency in
Wana?
Q: Wana is not a disputed area.
A: When you encounter militants there is bound to
be collateral damage. Last year there was an attack in front of
my house. The police waited for about 25 to 26 hours before taking
any action because girls (students) were present in the computer
training school nearby. They waited until the girls were safe.
Q: But why kill civilians?
A:
No civilians were killed.
Q: We have names and addresses of civilians who were killed.
A: That must have occurred before our arrival. There's
no doubt that in the past many civilian houses were bombed. But
we do not order attacks unless civilians are cleared from the area.
There is no collateral damage and that is the reason our government
is successful.
Q: Why are you and Delhi refusing to engage with the Geelani
faction of the APHC?
A:Dialogue is the only way, all other options have
been exhausted. The insurgency has lasted for the past 50 years
and several lives have been lost. Infrastructure, like schools and
bridges, have been ruined. Now that the government of India is offering
unconditional dialogue, you have to grab the opportunity. One day
everybody, not only the Hurriyat factions, but others also, will
come together because circumstances will lead them to it.
Q: Be it Yasin Malik, Ansari, Geelani or Shabir Shah,
their single condition for holding talks with you is that you stop
killing their people.
A: They are mistaken. I am telling you that no such
violence has occurred, and we have created a healthy atmosphere
for dialogue.
Q: Omar Abdullah, the opposition leader, says that your
'healing touch' is a hollow slogan and that human rights violations
have risen. How would you respond?
A: While I understand
that the opposition's job is to oppose, expose and depose, they
should not make such fake claims. We have repealed Pota and disbanded
the Special Operations Group. We conduct proper investigations of
all reported incidents and then the cases are taken to court.
Q: Do you think there is a possibility that you are not
looking at the real facts and are cut off from reality?
A: Absolutely not. I consider the ground reality.
We did as much as we could to curtail human rights violations. There
was an incident of custodial death in our neighborhood, where we
took immediate action and dismissed the culprit on the spot.
Q: But isn't it true that you have no real power and that
Delhi rules the roost?
A: These are just rumours. I do not care about such
rumours. Unless you win the public's trust and their hearts, you
will not have power. If people don't support you, then you cannot
claim authority over them.
Q: A part of your election agenda was to negotiate with
the militants. Is that in process?
A: We are trying to make them understand our position.
The Hurriyat factions are also making efforts. There were several
efforts before as well. For example, earlier, the home secretary
of India had come here to negotiate a ceasefire with the militants.
It's an ongoing process.
|