|
He
was cool and relaxed in a baby blue shirt, deep blue tie and navy
jacket. His hair was expertly blow-dried. As the TV cameras zoomed
in, President Pervez Musharraf looked slick, sartorially and otherwise.
And when veteran interviewer Steve Kroft of the iconic newsmagazine
show, '60 Minutes,' asked Musharraf about the message former deputy
secretary of state Richard Armitage delivered to the Pakistan government
in the days immediately following the terror attacks of September
11, 2001, Musharraf didn't miss a beat. "The director of intelligence
told me that [Armitage] said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared
to go back to the Stone Age.'"
Kroft
tried to seem surprised, like he wasn't expecting that response,
and then confirmed, "Richard Armitage said you should, 'Be
prepared to be bombed back to the Stone Age?'"
With
a slight smile, Musharraf nodded quickly and said, "Yeah."
This
exchange, in reference, to statements made in President Musharraf's
memoir, In the Line of Fire, and which aired on Sunday, September
24, across America on CBS, should have sent the sales of his book
skyrocketing on Monday morning. But the fact is, the comment already
had pushed the book into the pre-release sales stratosphere before
Sunday. For the show that aired Sunday was actually recorded three
days earlier and the hot piece of geo-political gossip was leaked
to the press the same day. By Friday morning, it was headline news
across America, and Pakistan for that matter.
It
didn't take long before a reporter asked President Bush to comment
on it the next day at the White House. Bush claimed that the first
time he heard of the alleged threat was in the newspaper that morning.
"I was taken aback by the harshness of the words," he
said. Richard Armitage denies the statement, but admits to having
a very "strong conversation" with the then Chief of ISI.
"I've never made a threat in my life that I couldn't back up,"
says the barrel-chested ex-diplomat. "I wasn't authorised to
say such a thing. As I couldn't back up that threat, I never said
it."
The authenticity of the statement, and its sheer audacity,
had the world talking for days. It was the perfect bait to reel
in the media and book-buying public. On Friday evening, Musharraf's
memoir sat at number 122 in the pre-release sales list on Amazon.com.
Two days later, and even before the '60 Minutes' segment was aired,
In the Line of Fire hit number 11.
So
who leaked the news? Was it someone inside CBS, or was the whole
thing orchestrated by someone at Simon & Schuster. Well, for
all intents and purposes it amounts to the same thing. Simon &
Schuster is the publishing arm of CBS Corporation, who is of course,
the broadcaster of '60 Minutes.'
It didn't take long for people to figure out what was happening.
Between speeches at the UN, meetings with President Bush and his
official book launch, the President of Pakistan hit the news and
talk show circuit with a rare zeal and energy. Besides '60 Minutes,'
Musharraf had appearances on CNN's 'Situation Room' with Wolf Blitzer,
the 'Today Show' and amazingly a late-night comedy talk show that
specialises in fake news, 'The Daily Show' with Jon Stewart.
After
Musharraf's winning performance on 'The Daily Show,' where with
a cup of jasmine tea in his hand, he answered Stewart's first question
of "Where's Osama bin Laden?" with, "I don't know.
You know where he is? You lead on, we'll follow you," the US
media was again abuzz with Musharraf talk.
In
The Washington Post the next day, Libby Copeland wrote, "The
President of Pakistan has been in the United States lately to discuss
matters of global importance and - in his spare time - to flog a
memoir." According to the Post's staff writer, "Last night
he appeared on the 'Daily Show,' where he demonstrated both a sense
of humour and a deep desire to sell In the Line of Fire."
It
seemed, though, that Musharraf had one more thing on his agenda:
attacking Afghan President Hamid Karzai. In one-on-one interviews,
in press conferences and even during his book launch, Musharraf
wasted no opportunity to reject claims that Pakistan houses either
Taliban headquarters or training grounds. He shifted the blame for
Afghanistan's worsening woes squarely onto Karzai's shoulders, saying
that Afghanistan's largest ethnic group, the Pushtun, is feeling
alienated and there is a risk that the non-Taliban Pushtun will
join the resistance. "Don't let them join the Taliban and fight
a people's war against you," declared Musharraf from the Council
of Foreign Relations in New York, where his memoirs were being officially
launched. "This must be understood, and as soon as President
Karzai understands his own country's environment, the easier it
will be for him." His final jab at Karzai elicited laughter
from the crowd.
Karzai didn't take Musharraf's accusations lying down. He routinely
complained the Musharraf regime was not doing enough to wipe out
the roots of terrorism in Pakistan: reining in those madrassahs
that spew hatred and are used as fronts to train militants. In a
veiled reference to Pakistan on September 21 Karzai said, "You
cannot train a snake. It will come and bite you."
It's
no secret that the two leaders have been publicly blaming each other
for months now for the escalating violence in Afghanistan. In anticipation
of the Iftar dinner that President Bush was hosting on September
27 for the two Muslim leaders, the media described the meeting as
one between Bush's "bickering anti-terror allies," who
were involved in endless "public sniping."
With the book's official
launch on Monday September 25, multiple controversial stories were
lifted from the book and hit the headlines each day as separate
news pieces. According to the book, General Musharraf "war-gamed"
a confrontation with the United States, the CIA secretly paid Pakistan
"hundreds of millions of dollars in bounties" for the
capture of Al-Qaeda fighters, Indian scientists may have bought
black-market nuclear equipment via the Dr. A.Q. Khan network, and
the now-captured Al-Qaeda number three operative, Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed, took part in Daniel Pearl's killing.
But none of that was as interesting as Armitage's "Stone Age"
threat. The media meanwhile, seemed to latch on to the tense relations
between Musharraf and Karzai more than any of the other memoir stories.
When the media weighed in, they generally sided with Karzai. "The
real war on terror is going on in Afghanistan, and, frankly, it's
not at all clear that we're winning," said William Milam, a
former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan. "Pakistan could help by
keeping the Taliban out of there."
Barnett Rubin, of New York University, told the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee on September 21 that Pakistan was "the global centre
of terrorism." The South Asia expert said, "[Islamabad]
has done virtually nothing to disrupt the command and control of
the Taliban, which is based in Pakistan." He argued that foreign
influences in the destabilization of Afghanistan emanate from Pakistan,
"regardless of the fact that President Musharraf speaks good
English, wears a suit and says things that we like to hear."
The peace deal between the Pakistan army and pro-Taliban militants
in September, which pledged to halt cross-border movement between
Afghanistan and Pakistan, received plenty of bad press during Musharraf's
visit too. U.S. critics generally believe that Pakistan's recent
anti-terror efforts, instead of cracking down on extremists, give
pro-Taliban fighters a free rein in the area. An article in the
conservative magazine The Weekly Standard read, "One intelligence
source has opined that the gains of the past five years were reversed
in mere weeks with the loss of Waziristan and the release of 2,500
fighters."
On the Friday before his book launch, Musharraf, while at the White
House, stated, "The deal is not at all with the Taliban. This
deal is against the Taliban. The deal is with the tribal elders."
But during Musharraf's visit, a report emerged from Afghanistan
that provided ammunition to his critics. According to one U.S. military
officer, the number of attacks against US troops on Afghanistan's
eastern frontier have tripled since July 31. That's exactly around
the time the cease-fire began on June 25. The final negotiations
and signing on September 5th simply cemented the previous understanding.
This story got major traction in the US after being picked up by
USAToday under the headline "Afghan attacks up threefold since
Pakistani truce with tribesmen, US says." Newsday ran a similar
story, but added that there was more to the Waziristan Accord than
was officially disclosed.
Despite all these criticisms, Bush was, at least publicly, buying
everything Musharraf was selling. Media across the U.S. was quick
to pick up on these words from the U.S. President during a White
House press conference on September 22: "When the President
[Musharraf] looks me in the eye and says the tribal deal is intended
to reject the Talibanisation of the people and that there won't
be a Taliban and there won't be Al-Qaeda, I believe him," Bush
said.
Of course, there are many that don't buy what either are selling.
In an article from McClatchy Newspapers, reporter Ron Hutcheson
- McClatchy is America's second largest newspaper company and Hutcheson's
coverage of Musharraf was consistently harsh: Bush had "little
choice" but to accept Musharraf's word. "The US depends
heavily on Pakistani cooperation in the fight against Osama bin
Laden, and Bush risks jeopardizing the relationship by getting too
tough with the Pakistani military ruler," writes Hutcheson.
But Bush went beyond avoiding "getting too tough" with
his Pakistani counterpart. On September 22, on the White House lawn,
after Musharraf deflected a question about the "Stone Age"
threat by saying that he was "honour-bound" to his publisher
not to comment on his memoir before its official release, Bush piped
in with a unique plug for In the Line of Fire. "In other words,
'Buy the book,' is what he is saying," said Bush.
A Los Angeles Times editorial wrote this about the incident: "International
diplomacy has always been dependant on external factors, but it
has seldom hinged on the terms of a book contract. At a time when
the developing world is protesting what it sees as US unilateralism
and bullying
Musharraf's claim threw gasoline on the bonfire."
There were those, though, that were more envious than critical.
A senior publicist who works for a rival publishing house commented
on the exchange and was quoted in The Washington Times as saying,
"I'm listening to this stuff and thinking, 'This kind of talk
is priceless.'"
Even after leaving the U.S., Musharraf managed to plug his book
on TV. His talk and Q&A session at Cornell University on September
26 was broadcast on Book TV, on October 1 and 2.
Based on that alone, it could be argued that his trip was a success.
The media ate up all the juicy tidbits in his book, never mind that
the accuracy of many of Musharraf's versions of historical events
were questioned and more than a handful of reader reviews on Amazon.com
described his tome as 'a pack of lies.' Musharraf was also able
to sell a few copies and promote his version of the current Afghan
crisis as well. And even though many in the U.S. media disagree
with his version of reality, it does not matter. What does matter
is what the President of the United States thinks. And for now it
seems that he still considers Musharraf a trustworthy "friend."
Or maybe he is just better than the alternatives.
|