|
Musharraf's pardon indicated
a significant shift from his promise to punish all those found guilty
of leaking nuclear secrets. " Dr Khan is my hero and the nation's
hero and will remain so as he made Pakistan a nuclear power,"
declared the President at a press conference.
The move has helped diffuse public protest and prevent a
trial that could have serious domestic political implications for
President Musharraf who is facing the toughest challenge yet to
his rule. He faces opposition on his handling of the nuclear issue
not only from Islamic groups , but also from liberal opposition
parties like the PPP and PML(N) who accuse him of using Dr Khan
as a scapegoat.
Musharraf's
problems on both domestic and international fronts are far from
over after his decision to pardon Dr Khan. He now faces a separate
confrontation with the international nuclear watchdog, demanding
full access to Pakistan's nuclear programme in order to ensure that
no more nuclear secrets are sold to other countries. Mohammed El
Baradei, Head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Dr
Khan's revelations were only the tip of the iceberg. "Dr. Khan
was not working alone
there were items that were manufactured
in other countries, items that were reassembled in different countries.
We have to make sure it is not repeated."
Musharraf maintains that Pakistan is willing to discuss the
outcome of its investigation with the IAEA, but has rejected international
supervision of the country's nuclear programme. "No documents
will be submitted to the IAEA, to an independent inquiry, and we
will not allow the UN to supervise our nuclear programme,"
he declared. It will, however, be difficult for Pakistan to avoid
demands for intrusive international monitoring as evidence shows
that Dr Khan was at the centre of a clandestine nuclear black- market
network with tentacles spread over three continents. With the help
of middlemen belonging to various countries, it supplied nuclear
materials to Libya, Iran and North Korea. According to international
investigators, Pakistan had become a supermarket for the purchase
of nuclear technology.
Dr.
Khan's confession raised more questions than it answered. In a 12-page
signed statement, the disgraced father of Pakistan's nuclear programme
has confessed to transferring nuclear technology and hardware to
Iran, Libya and North Korea. He claimed it was all due to ideological
reasons and not for money, as he wanted to strengthen the defence
capabilities of Islamic countries.
According to some reports, Dr Khan claimed that centrifugal
uranium enrichment plants were exported to Iran through a Pakistani
businessman and that Pakistan air force planes were used to ferry
the goods to Dubai from where they were taken to their final destinations.
Drawings and other nuclear materials were also transferred abroad
secretly. Most of the transactions took place through two Dubai-based,
Sri Lankan middlemen. The deals were made at Dubai, Istanbul and
Casablanca between 1988 and 2001.
In exchange for cash
transfers to his bank account in the Gulf, Dr Khan helped Libya
establish contact with blackmarket networks. From 1995 until last
year, Libya received centrifuge equipment used for enrichment of
uranium and blueprints for making a nuclear bomb. The network Dr
Khan built involved a Malaysian engineering firm and middlemen from
Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa and Sri Lanka.
Although
Dr Khan claimed he was driven by Islamic zeal to pass on nuclear
technology to Muslim countries like Iran and Libya, his links with
the North Korean nuclear programme ran even deeper. Pakistan's defence
cooperation with North Korea started in 1994, when the then prime
minister went there to negotiate a missile deal. Pakistan desperately
needed a nuclear missile system at that point to counter India's.
Pakistani
officials said North Korean scientists received nuclear briefings
at Khan Research Laboratories, although even top Pakistani civilian
leaders were not allowed to visit the highly guarded secret facility.
In 1999, the ISI reportedly intercepted an air force aircraft, which
was allegedly carrying nuclear material to North Korea. Dr Khan
was reprimanded, but no action was taken against him at that point.
He was sacked in 2001 for this reason, under US pressure.
Dr Khan apparently traded nuclear technology in return for missiles
from North Korea, which are the mainstay of Pakistan's nuclear weapon-delivery
system. The KRL later developed its own medium- and long-distance
missile system based on North Korean technology.
Most defence analysts and political leaders doubt that Dr
Khan could have traded secrets abroad without the knowledge of senior
military and intelligence officials who controlled the nuclear programme.
General Musharraf said Khan was solely responsible for the leakage
of nuclear secrets and denied any official sanctions. "All
the proliferation, unfortunately, was under the supervision and
orders of Khan. No government official or military man was involved,"
he said.
In his public confession Dr Khan also accepted full responsibility
for the scandal, absolving the government and his fellow scientists
of any blame. But most analysts are skeptical of these claims and
doubt if such a widespread transfer of nuclear know-how and hardware
could have taken place without the knowledge of military leaders.
Many commentators said Dr Khan's public confession smacked of a
cover-up.
"Given the massive security in place for nuclear installations
and personal security of the scientists, could any of them engage
in clandestine activities without being noticed? " questioned
Hasan Askari Rizvi, a defence analyst.
Musharraf
has let some of the military generals whose names were mentioned
in the proliferation scandal off the hook for obvious reasons. "Musharraf
has omitted to note the most critical factor in such reckoning,
the unaccountable status of the Pakistan army as the guardian of
our nuclear programme," says an analyst.
Two former chiefs of army staff, General Aslam Beg and Jehangir
Karamat were also questioned, along with Lt. General ( retd.) Zulfiqar
Ali Khan by Pakistani investigators. While they were absolved of
any wrongdoing, they admitted a failure of intelligence and negligence.
No action has been taken against General Aslam Beg who has
been accused of trying to sell nuclear technology to Iran. General
Beg was the chief of army staff from 1988 to 1991, the period when
the alleged transfer of technology to Iran occurred.
Defence analysts maintain
that the scientists could not have moved without General Beg's approval.
"General Beg was the boss when the leakage occurred. He must
have given the clearance, " said Lt. General ( Retd.) Talat
Massood.
General Beg has dismissed the allegation as "fabrication
and malicious." He, however, defended Dr Khan, saying he was
morally and legally justified in passing on nuclear knowhow to other
countries. "It is not a crime to transfer your nuclear knowledge,"
he declared.
A major reason cited by officials for not broadening the
investigation into the proliferation scandal to the military or
the government is that this could have serious implications for
the country. Musharraf warned that Pakistan could face UN sanctions
if official complicity in transfer of nuclear technology was established.
But some observers believe that international agencies will continue
to push Pakistan to explain how the transfer of nuclear technology
could take place without the approval of the powerful military,
which controlled the nuclear programme.
It was largely external pressure that forced Musharraf to
confront the problem of proliferation. "The international community
not only wanted to know what happened in the past, but also sought
reassurance that no nuclear proliferation will happen in the future,"
said a senior Pakistani official. Musharraf has argued that the
international community was satisfied by his assurance that there
was no more leakage in Pakistan's nuclear pipeline. The action against
Khan and other scientists underlined President Musharraf's seriousness
and commitment that the state will not permit any individual to
be involved in proliferation activities," said a senior official.
Most
observers agree that the proliferation case is not over yet. The
government, for its own reasons, is reluctant to go into the depths
of a scandal that has put the security of the country at stake.
The military authorities are trying to sweep the whole issue under
the carpet by blaming just one person and absolving other culprits.
Musharraf has warned journalists not to speculate further on the
military's role in peddling nuclear secrets, saying it would not
be in the national interest. But is it in the national interest
to protect the people who have committed a crime against the country
with their irresponsible and rogue policies?
Musharraf
is right when he said the country was standing at the crossroads,
but his own attitude does not indicate whether he realises the seriousness
of the situation. Responsible leaders do not flaunt their nuclear
capability as he did by declaring that Pakistan had gone beyond
the minimum deterrent. Is it necessary at this stage, when the country
faces international censure for nuclear proliferation, to accuse
a past government of nuclear rollback? It is time to unite the nation
and take responsibility for past mistakes.
|