If the
MMA were allowed free rein in this country, it would
ensure that not just every madrassa, but every school
in this country, churn out jihadis - enough cannon
fodder for all the jihads in the world.
The
frontal assault they have launched on attempts to
purge school textbooks of some of the vitriol written
in the name of religion is outrageous. Even more alarming
is how the federal education minister is running for
cover. Instead of taking on the MMA mullahs, she went
on the defensive - in one TV programme, she reassured
the MMA's Liaquat Baloch that there were 11 or 12
chapters on jihad in one textbook alone.
Incidentally,
jihad and militancy are not the only "virtues"
textbooks are extolling as the cardinal principles
of Islam. They are preaching intolerance, hatred and
disrespect for other religions, Hinduism in particular,
by demonising the entire race. A few choice quotes:
"Hindus please the goddess Kali by slaughtering
people of other religions at her feet"
"The religion of the Hindus did not teach them
good things"
"The Hindus live in
small and dark houses."
Under
virulent attack from religious parties and the right-wing
media for exposing all this and even more lethal stuff
that kids are being taught in government schools is
the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI).
It is being accused of pursuing the agenda of "foreign
donors." So what else is new - whether it be
the SDPI or the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan,
the religious brigade has fallen into the habit of
branding all NGOs that dare to confront them, or are
inimical to their interests, as being lackeys of the
west. It is a convenient, multi-purpose stick to beat
the liberals with - more so in the post-September
11 scenario.
The
SDPI report, The Subtle Subversion: The State of the
Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan, with painstaking
research by 30 scholars, educationists and teachers,
was intended to point out the flaws in the national
curriculum and textbooks used in our public schools
with a view to assist in the process of initiating
reform.
The report contains some startling disclosures
about the insidious manner in which students are being
converted into narrow-minded religious bigots and
chauvinists - all in the name of national interest
and Islamic ideology. The report highlights the gross
distortion of history, insensitivity to other religions,
the focus on war and militarism and the demeaning
representation of women.
Unfortunately, the critics of the SDPI report
have no answer to these criticisms. Instead, what
they've chosen to do, as always, is to cloak their
rhetoric with the cover of religion and national interest
- both of which, in their view, are sacrosanct.
If the SDPI was looking to General Musharraf
for support, given his avowed claims of eradicating
intolerance and extremism from society and introducing
an era of enlightened moderation, it was in for a
rude shock. In fact, Musharraf's education minister
said the report had been rejected by the 15-member
review committee because it represented an "extremist
viewpoint" - a claim disputed by the SDPI, which
maintains that the report was endorsed by a vote of
9 to 6.
The retrogressive forces have been allowed
to win, yet again, in the name of political expediency.
The religious brigade's clout extends right
up to the Presidency. General Musharraf was forced
to backtrack on even the minor changes proposed in
the blasphemy law, following pressure from religious
parties.
Is there
any hope, then, for those who propose serious reform
in educational institutions? President Musharraf has
often spoken in defence of the institution of madrassas
and talked of reforming them, and of modernising them
by introducing subjects like English and computer
science. But, in reality, these steps are not enough
to counter the deadly brain-washing that is practised
in the madrassas and public schools.
It's time someone stood up to the dark forces of regression
and extremism.
And who better than General Musharraf - if
he has the courage of his convictions, that is.