|
Most
year-ends involve winding up work and closing files on lingering
projects. But 2005 has proved to be remarkably different on this
front. President General Pervez Musharraf used the year's last quarter
to open up new fronts and plunged into his most contentious issue
to date: building the controversial Kalabagh Dam.
Driving
the present push for more dams is a publicly-expressed concern that
the country is teetering on the brink of becoming water-scarce.
A
burgeoning population, excessive water-wastage, and upstream water
manipulation by India, is making water a commodity that communities
might soon die and kill for. More dams are needed, goes the official
logic, to trap a chunk of around 35.2 million acre feet (MAF), that
goes into the Arabian Sea. And for this, the logic continues, a
couple of dams need to be built on the Indus and Kabul rivers, including
the Kalabagh Dam in the NWFP, and Bhasha in Diamer in the Northern
Areas, Akhori in Attock and Skardu in the Northern Areas-the last
two only after completion of their feasibilities.
But
this logic holds good only on paper. On the stony ground of divided
politics and deep distrust among the four provinces, the general
acceptance of the need for better water management and storage has
not translated into an endorsement of the President's pitch for
specific projects. The Kalabagh Dam particularly has become the
proverbial red rag to the bull of enraged sentiments in the provinces
of Sind, NWFP and Balochistan. The last six weeks, since the debate
began on the building of dams, there have been dozens of rallies
and protest marches organised by regional parties, that have picketed
against the dam idea. All opposition parties and even government
allies in Sindh, like the MQM and the ruling Muslim League and federal
ministers from these provinces, have started to pull their weight
against the scheme. It is a rare situation in which the government's
sitting ministers have threatened to resign if Kalabagh is built.
"They
(our voters) will demolish the graves of our ancestors if the Kalabagh
dam is built", said a frustrated Sindh federal minister to
the President when he was asked about the political costs of building
the dam. Still there is no let-up in the official push for the dam.
Insiders say that President Pervez Musharraf is totally convinced
of the urgent need for building a water storage capacity for future
use.
"It is not a sudden discovery on his part. He has been
briefed on the issue dozens of times ever since he came to power
and the data that has been accumulated, clearly indicates that the
Kalabagh Dam is the most feasible project that is ready-to-launch",
says a member of a team of experts that has been rendering advice
on the issue to President Musharraf. The same source also claimed
that, for all practical purposes, the decision to build the dams
was taken last year even before the two committees, the Technical
Committee on Water Resources and the Parliamentary Committee on
Water Resources, were established. "These committees though
were tasked to furnish the technical and political feasibility of
the project, but the data base that they were working with (mostly
provided by Wapda, IRSA and Planning and Development Division),
was already in favour of Kalabagh and other dams, and to the best
of my information there were not many who believed that the committees
would come up with a radically different position on the subject".
Both
the committees - whose reports were made public five months after
they were finalised, and then too only because they were leaked
to the press - have cast their vote in favour of the four dams.
While the reports recommend different strategies for getting to
the final decision, the four projects have all been declared kosher.
The final announcement on the score is still a Gordian Knot. President
Musharraf's establishment is using all its levers to bend and break
the opposition to the Kalabagh Dam. The most obvious ally in this
endeavour happens to be the Punjab's Kalabaghphiles. "Total
and unconditional support is available from the Punjab. If anything,
their (the Punjab) lobby, is more keen to get the dam going quickly
before other projects. Or at least simultaneously with other projects.
But the President will make his own preference and priorities,"
says a close aide to the President.
"Our
political assessment of the reaction to the building of the Kalabagh
Dam is quite hopeful. The report that has been submitted to the
President of Pakistan suggests that apart from the ANP, whose political
constituency has been tied to the anti-Kalabagh Dam stance, the
general atmosphere in the NWFP is not all that aggressive and can
be turned in favour of the project", says an intelligence source.
The same assessment also recommends that the main groups that need
to be woven into the project's favour in the NWFP happen to be the
religious parties. The accompanying strategy for mustering support
involves a complex interplay of carrot-and-stick in the shape of
generous funding to the newly-elected local government Nazims, enforcement
of party discipline on reluctant religious party figures and maximum
projection of the positive benefits of the project through the national
media.
For
Sindh, the lower riparian province already writhing for being hoodwinked
through the Chasma-Jhelum canal that cuts into its water share and
feeds the private landholdings of Punjab's elite, mostly with military
backgrounds, the strategy is different. Arbab Ghulam Rahim, the
province's resourceful chief minister fresh from his award-winning
performance against the opposition in the local bodies elections,
is supposed to be won over by cajoling and coercion to back the
dam. A package of assurances and additional funds for local development
is to be made available. Some guarantees of a political share in
the power pie after the 2007 elections is also on the plate to make
the proposition more palatable. Parallel to this effort, are attempts
to get prominent Sindhi politicians to speak in favour of the dam
and the Pir of Pagaro has fired the first salvo already.
"We
have to address the existing grievances of different groups and
then the remaining opposition, a minority, will not matter. At any
rate we cannot build a 100 per cent consensus. There will always
be those lobbies who will be outside the general agreement",
says a source close to the President summing up General Musharraf's
thinking on resistance to a scheme that he is convinced is good
for the country. So far the strategy seems to have worked. The Jamaat-e-Islami,
Musharraf's fieriest critics, have gone positively mute on the issue
and Qazi Hussain Ahmad sounds cooperative when he talks about the
need for a, "consensus for a technically reasonable scheme."
The Jamaat's Punjab lobby has been effectively using its clout to
bring about this softness of posture. The Pakistan Muslim League
(N) has the building of the Kalabagh Dam as part of its manifesto,
which has reduced its protest to the refrain of, "taking everyone
along" and "not imposing a decision to the detriment of
the country." The People's Party also faces the same dilemma.
Its Punjab chapter has told party leaders not to force them to publicly
oppose the dam - a policy that is totally contrary to the People's
Party Sindh's total rejection of the scheme.
It is against this background that, increasingly the President's
own preferences seem to tally with that of the Punjab's, creating
an image of the federation being dictated to by the bigger province.
At an anti-Kalabagh rally in Jehangira, the area where the Indus
and Kabul meet , Punjab-bashing was as common as swipes against
President Musharraf. "We will not accept Punjab's dictation
and if the President is interested in being its slave, then he is
like a Ranjeet Singh for us", said a leader of the Awami National
Party, one of the main sponsors of the rally. "Make-up your
mind: it is either the federation of Pakistan or Kalabagh Dam"
thundered a Sindh nationalist at the rally.
This
political slogan-shouting resonates in the bazaars where information
about the whole project and its pros and cons is almost non-existent.
Haji Gul, who runs a local fruit shop in Jehangira, finds it impossible
to accept that the project is meant for NWFP's benefit as well.
"This is what they said about the Tarbela Dam. They took my
lands and I am still to be compensated for the loss. Two of my brothers
have passed away waiting for the promised compensation. Punjab does
not allow us to have wheat and our mills have closed down. Now Kalabagh
Dam will only mean further misery for us," said the 60-year-old
Mr Gul. However, the rally, supposedly a show for the decision-makers
in Islamabad, did not pull in huge crowds. Barely 15,000 attended
the meeting and there was no burning of effigies nor frothing at
the mouth by the participants.
Yet
a poisonous stew of diverse frustrations is on the boil. The dam
has come up for a final decision at a time when nationalist forces
are in a state of combat: Balochistan's persistent problems of law
and order have become the general rallying cry for a rebellious
nationalist cadre; ANP and the Pakhtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party are
struggling to build their lost support base against the religious
right; the Sindhi nationalists are already on the back-foot and
disempowered by a manipulated political system. The Kalabagh Dam
provides all three an excellent opportunity to claim popular martyrdom.
Intelligence
assessments of the trouble in Balochistan have consistently documented
support in the shape of arms and money coming from Afghanistan and
Iran, mainly funnelled by Indian consulates in the two countries.
More recent assessments mention the Kalabagh Dam as a "potential
sour point to be exploited by outside forces." Ironically,
the water scarcity issue has brought into focus an even bigger scarcity:
that of a political system where national tension can be defused
before it spills into the streets.
|